James Hazel
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 10%
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 8
-
- Law, AI, and Intellectual Property 7
- Co-authors
- Ellen Wright Clayton (7 shared papers)Mark A. Rothstein (3 shared papers)Barbara J. Evans (2 shared papers)Bradley Malin (5 shared papers)Murat Kantarcıoğlu (2 shared papers)Zhiyu Wan (2 shared papers)Yevgeniy Vorobeychik (2 shared papers)Christopher Slobogin (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Law and the Biosciences (3 papers)Nature Reviews Genetics (2 papers)The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics (1 paper)Journal of Sleep Research (1 paper)Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandJapan
In The Last Decade
James Hazel
14 papers receiving 296 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Health Informatics 14
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 123
- Genetics 110
- Artificial Intelligence 74
- Reproductive Medicine 19
Countries citing papers authored by James Hazel
This map shows the geographic impact of James Hazel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Hazel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Hazel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Hazel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Hazel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Hazel. The network helps show where James Hazel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Hazel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 118 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 79 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 4 | Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing. | 2019 | 20 |
| 5 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 7 | Who Knows What, and When?: A Survey of the Privacy Policies Proffered by U.S. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies. | 2019 | 12 |
| 8 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 10 | A World of Difference? Law Enforcement, Genetic Data, and the Fourth Amendment | 2021 | 3 |
| 11 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 1 |
About James Hazel
James Hazel is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Artificial Intelligence, Physiology, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (8 papers), Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (7 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (5 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (2 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (2 papers) and Forensic and Genetic Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (14 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (123 citations), Genetics (110 citations), Artificial Intelligence (74 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (19 citations). James Hazel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Wright Clayton, Mark A. Rothstein, Barbara J. Evans, Bradley Malin, Murat Kantarcıoğlu, Zhiyu Wan, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, Christopher Slobogin, Catherine M. Hammack‐Aviran and Laura M. Beskow. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Law and the Biosciences, Nature Reviews Genetics, The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, Journal of Sleep Research and Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.