James Hamm

517 citations
9 papers · 432 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

James Hamm

6 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers

James Hamm
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Conservation 39
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 166
  • Earth-Surface Processes 49
  • Archeology 72
  • Archeology 6
Replace Maria Rosaria Barone Lumaga with:
Maria Rosaria Barone Lumaga Italy
Rosanna Caramiello Italy
Constantino Ruibal Spain
Jim Williams United Kingdom
Christine Heinz France
Deborah Isocrono Italy
Jorge Rodríguez‐Castro Spain
Laurent Fabre France
D. C. Bharadwaj
N. Y. Sandwith United Kingdom
James Hamm relative to Maria Rosaria Barone Lumaga Italy Maria Rosaria Barone Lumaga's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Maria Rosaria Barone Lumaga · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Hamm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Hamm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Hamm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Hamm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Hamm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Hamm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Hamm. The network helps show where James Hamm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside James Hamm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Hamm Line = papers co-authored together James Hamm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2004368
2 198647
3 201711
4 19812
5 20222
6 19811
7 19801
8
The Reinstallation of an 1830's Zuber Scenic Wallpaper at the Martin Van Buren National Historic Site
19880
9 20040

About James Hamm

James Hamm is a scholar working on Archeology, Conservation, Space and Planetary Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ophthalmology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation Techniques and Studies (2 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (2 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (1 paper), Building materials and conservation (1 paper), Botanical Research and Chemistry (1 paper), Historical and Archaeological Studies (1 paper), Laser Material Processing Techniques (1 paper) and 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (39 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (166 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (49 citations), Archeology (72 citations) and Archeology (6 citations). James Hamm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Jean H. Langenheim, Laura Mora, Paul Philippot, Aaron Shugar, Takaaki Harada, Stephanie Spence, Rebecca Ploeger, Keshav M. Dani, Skylar Deckoff–Jones and Kevin Casey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, Studies in Conservation, Materials and Bulletin of the Association for Preservation Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact