James G. Porterfield
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Surgery
- Molecular Biology
- Epidemiology
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Vivek Y. ReddyGery TomassoniJohn IpPaul A. FriedmanRajesh BankerImran NiaziRahul N. DoshiT. Jared Bunch
- Topics
- Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (12 papers)Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (11 papers)Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenCanada
In The Last Decade
James G. Porterfield
22 papers receiving 884 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 804
- Surgery 112
- Molecular Biology 79
- Epidemiology 71
- Emergency Medicine 65
Countries citing papers authored by James G. Porterfield
This map shows the geographic impact of James G. Porterfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James G. Porterfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James G. Porterfield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James G. Porterfield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James G. Porterfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James G. Porterfield. The network helps show where James G. Porterfield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James G. Porterfield
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James G. Porterfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James G. Porterfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James G. Porterfield. James G. Porterfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Percutaneous Implantation of an Entirely Intracardiac Leadless Pacemakerbreakdown → | 333 |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 38 | |
| 5 | 70 | |
| 6 | 60 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 50 | |
| 17 | 75 | |
| 18 | 80 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 51 |
About James G. Porterfield
James G. Porterfield is a scholar working on Microbiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Emergency Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 923 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (12 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (11 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (804 citations), Emergency Medicine (65 citations) and Neurology (55 citations). James G. Porterfield has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Vivek Y. Reddy, Gery Tomassoni, John Ip, Paul A. Friedman, Rajesh Banker, Imran Niazi, Rahul N. Doshi, T. Jared Bunch, Kenneth Plunkitt and James E. Ip. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, CHEST Journal and The American Journal of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.