Frederic L. Sax
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Surgery top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Mary E. CharlsonSuzanne FieldsC. Ronald MacKenzieR. Gordon DouglasRobert L. BrahamStephen E. EpsteinPierre ThérouxRichard O. Cannon
- Topics
- Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (5 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers)Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineInternal MedicineCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Frederic L. Sax
23 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 885
- Surgery 532
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 276
- Epidemiology 240
- Emergency Medicine 161
Countries citing papers authored by Frederic L. Sax
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic L. Sax's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic L. Sax with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic L. Sax more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederic L. Sax
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic L. Sax. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic L. Sax. The network helps show where Frederic L. Sax may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederic L. Sax
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederic L. Sax. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederic L. Sax based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederic L. Sax. Frederic L. Sax is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 73 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 66 | |
| 4 | 57 | |
| 5 | 158 | |
| 6 | 171 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 177 | |
| 9 | 75 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 199 | |
| 14 | 77 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 92 | |
| 17 | 150 | |
| 18 | 78 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Frederic L. Sax
Frederic L. Sax is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Emergency Medicine, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers) and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (885 citations), Internal Medicine (125 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (133 citations). Frederic L. Sax has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mary E. Charlson, Suzanne Fields, C. Ronald MacKenzie, R. Gordon Douglas, Robert L. Braham, Stephen E. Epstein, Pierre Théroux, Richard O. Cannon, Steven Snapinn and Xue-Qiao Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Circulation and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.