C. B. Markwardt

21.4k total citations · 4 hit papers
409 papers, 6.4k citations indexed

About

C. B. Markwardt is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Biomedical Engineering and Computational Mechanics. According to data from OpenAlex, C. B. Markwardt has authored 409 papers receiving a total of 6.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 378 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 110 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 92 papers in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in C. B. Markwardt's work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (238 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (218 papers) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (149 papers). C. B. Markwardt is often cited by papers focused on Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (238 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (218 papers) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (149 papers). C. B. Markwardt collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. C. B. Markwardt's co-authors include J. H. Swank, Tod E. Strohmayer, S. D. Barthelmy, R. F. Mushotzky, J. Tueller, N. Gehrels, M. van der Klis, R. Wijnands, Deepto Chakrabarty and W. H. Baumgartner and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and The Astrophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

C. B. Markwardt

356 papers receiving 6.1k citations

Hit Papers

Calibration of the Rossi X‐Ray Timing Explorer Proportion... 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 2013 2018 2022 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. B. Markwardt United States 45 6.1k 1.8k 1.2k 437 249 409 6.4k
Ronald E. Taam United States 36 5.1k 0.8× 786 0.4× 796 0.6× 194 0.4× 425 1.7× 141 5.3k
J. E. Pringle United Kingdom 38 5.1k 0.8× 983 0.6× 560 0.4× 271 0.6× 222 0.9× 97 5.3k
Thomas J. Maccarone United States 37 5.3k 0.9× 1.5k 0.9× 487 0.4× 433 1.0× 362 1.5× 256 5.4k
J. P. Halpern United States 44 6.4k 1.0× 2.1k 1.2× 721 0.6× 112 0.3× 315 1.3× 221 6.5k
E. P. J. van den Heuvel Netherlands 34 4.0k 0.7× 823 0.5× 683 0.5× 217 0.5× 207 0.8× 133 4.2k
J. E. Pringle Russia 43 8.3k 1.4× 735 0.4× 578 0.5× 264 0.6× 413 1.7× 127 8.5k
Brian D. Metzger United States 57 10.5k 1.7× 3.4k 1.9× 615 0.5× 132 0.3× 302 1.2× 207 10.9k
S. Rappaport United States 45 6.7k 1.1× 710 0.4× 827 0.7× 206 0.5× 1.1k 4.5× 209 6.9k
N. Gehrels United States 46 8.1k 1.3× 2.7k 1.5× 300 0.2× 154 0.4× 731 2.9× 201 8.4k
C. Knigge United Kingdom 37 4.7k 0.8× 904 0.5× 431 0.3× 186 0.4× 586 2.4× 221 4.8k

Countries citing papers authored by C. B. Markwardt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. B. Markwardt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. B. Markwardt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. B. Markwardt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. B. Markwardt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. B. Markwardt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. B. Markwardt. The network helps show where C. B. Markwardt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. B. Markwardt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. B. Markwardt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. B. Markwardt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. B. Markwardt. C. B. Markwardt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lien, A. Y., H. A. Krimm, C. B. Markwardt, et al.. (2025). The 157 Month Swift/BAT All-sky Hard X-Ray Survey. The Astrophysical Journal. 989(2). 161–161. 1 indexed citations
2.
Ng, Mason, Jeremy Hare, Gaurava K. Jaisawal, et al.. (2024). Tentative Blazar Candidate EP240709A Associated with 4FGL J0031.5−5648: NICER and Archival Multiwavelength Observations. Research Notes of the AAS. 8(11). 292–292. 1 indexed citations
3.
Parsotan, Tyler, D. M. Palmer, A. Y. Lien, et al.. (2023). BatAnalysis: A Comprehensive Python Pipeline for Swift BAT Survey Analysis. The Astrophysical Journal. 953(2). 155–155. 4 indexed citations
4.
Pal, Sabyasachi, Gaurava K. Jaisawal, Keith C. Gendreau, et al.. (2023). Probing spectral and timing properties of the X-ray pulsar RX J0440.9 + 4431 in the giant outburst of 2022–2023. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 526(1). 771–781. 4 indexed citations
5.
Sambruna, R. M., Joshua E. Schlieder, D. Kocevski, et al.. (2022). The NASA Multi-Messenger Astrophysics Science Support Center (MOSSAIC). Astronomy and Computing. 40. 100582–100582. 2 indexed citations
6.
Bult, Peter, D. Altamirano, Zaven Arzoumanian, et al.. (2018). On the 2018 Outburst of the Accreting Millisecond X-Ray Pulsar Swift J1756.9–2508 As Seen with NICER. The Astrophysical Journal. 864(1). 14–14. 9 indexed citations
7.
Oh, Kyuseok, Michael Koss, C. B. Markwardt, et al.. (2018). The 105-Month Swift-BAT All-sky Hard X-Ray Survey. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 235(1). 4–4. 216 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Bult, Peter, D. Altamirano, Zaven Arzoumanian, et al.. (2018). NICER Detects a Soft X-Ray Kilohertz Quasi-periodic Oscillation in 4U 0614+09. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 860(1). L9–L9. 14 indexed citations
9.
Ricci, Cláudio, F. E. Bauer, P. Arévalo, et al.. (2016). IC 751: A New Changing Look AGN Discovered By <i>NuSTAR</i>. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU). 53 indexed citations
10.
Strohmayer, Tod E., et al.. (2010). A Refined Orbital Solution and the Transient Pulsar in Terzan 5 is Not Eclipsing. The astronomer's telegram. 2946. 1.
11.
Ziaeepour, H., S. T. Holland, Patricia T. Boyd, et al.. (2008). GRB 060607A: A gamma-ray burst with bright asynchronous early X-ray and optical emissions. UCL Discovery (University College London). 19 indexed citations
12.
Markwardt, C. B., J. P. Halpern, S. T. Holland, et al.. (2008). RXTE and Swift Observations of SWIFT J1842.5-1124. ATel. 1716. 1. 2 indexed citations
13.
Markwardt, C. B., et al.. (2008). RXTE Detects a Transient, XTE J1812-182 ( = XMMU J181227.8-181234 ? ). ATel. 1685. 1. 1 indexed citations
14.
Krimm, H. A., L. Barbier, S. D. Barthelmy, et al.. (2007). GRB 070129, Swift-BAT refined analysis of a particularly long.. GCN. 6058. 1. 1 indexed citations
15.
Münz, F., et al.. (2006). GRB 060929: BART observation.. GRB Coordinates Network. 5658. 1. 1 indexed citations
16.
Swank, J. H., et al.. (2006). Renewed Low Level X-ray Activity of GX 339-4. ATel. 944. 1. 1 indexed citations
17.
Palmer, D. M., S. D. Barthelmy, N. Gehrels, et al.. (2005). Swift-BAT discovery of a transient pulsar SWIFT J1626.6-5156. ATel. 678. 1. 1 indexed citations
18.
Kennea, J. A., et al.. (2005). Swift Detection of Flaring X-ray Activity from IGR J16479-4514. UCL Discovery (University College London). 599. 1. 1 indexed citations
19.
Laycock, S., R. H. D. Corbet, D. Perrodin, et al.. (2002). Discovery of a new transient X-ray pulsar in the Small Magellanic Cloud. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 13 indexed citations
20.
Zand, J. J. M. in ’t, C. B. Markwardt, A. Bazzano, et al.. (2002). The nature of the X-ray transient SAX J1711.6-3808. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026