Edward Nathan
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
-
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 10
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 4
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 3
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 2
-
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena 3
- Co-authors
- Adam Ingram (10 shared papers)Andrew Mummery (3 shared papers)Sjoert van Velzen (1 shared paper)Steven A. Balbus (1 shared paper)Erica Hammerstein (1 shared paper)J. Homan (2 shared papers)P. Uttley (2 shared papers)Daniela Huppenkothen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (6 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Edward Nathan
8 papers receiving 79 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 14
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 97
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 33
- Instrumentation 3
- Geophysics 8
- Biomedical Engineering 16
Countries citing papers authored by Edward Nathan
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Nathan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Nathan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Nathan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Nathan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Nathan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Nathan. The network helps show where Edward Nathan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edward Nathan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 41 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 30 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 0 |
About Edward Nathan
Edward Nathan is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Geophysics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 104 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (10 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (4 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (3 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (3 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (2 papers), Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies (2 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (1 paper) and Statistical and numerical algorithms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (97 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (33 citations), Instrumentation (3 citations), Geophysics (8 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (16 citations). Edward Nathan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Adam Ingram, Andrew Mummery, Sjoert van Velzen, Steven A. Balbus, Erica Hammerstein, J. Homan, P. Uttley, Daniela Huppenkothen, S. Motta and D. Altamirano. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.