James E. Glazer

661 citations
19 papers · 404 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Glazer

17 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

James E. Glazer
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • General Decision Sciences 27
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 237
  • Applied Psychology 40
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 97
  • Clinical Psychology 92
Replace A. Hunter Threadgill with:
A. Hunter Threadgill United States
Keisha Novak United States
Erdem Pulcu United Kingdom
Rista C. Plate United States
Daniel Wiswede Germany
Stephan Nebe Germany
Ozlem Korucuoglu United States
Gabry W. Mies Netherlands
Jessica Aylward United Kingdom
Kristine M. McGlennen United States
James E. Glazer relative to A. Hunter Threadgill United States A. Hunter Threadgill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
A. Hunter Threadgill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Glazer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Glazer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Glazer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Glazer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Glazer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Glazer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Glazer. The network helps show where James E. Glazer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Glazer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Glazer Line = papers co-authored together James E. Glazer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2018233
2 201839
3 202233
4 201520
5 202014
6 20189
7 20218
8 20227
9 20197
10 20236
11 20196
12 20226
13 20166
14 20234
15 20243
16 20232
17 20241
18 20240
19 20250

About James E. Glazer

James E. Glazer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (27 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (237 citations), Applied Psychology (40 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (97 citations) and Clinical Psychology (92 citations). James E. Glazer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Robin Nusslock, Nicholas J. Kelley, Narun Pornpattananangkul, Vijay A. Mittal, Shinobu Kitayama, Conor H. Murray, Royce Lee, Harriet de Wit, Hidefumi Hitokoto and Anthony P. King. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychology, Psychophysiology, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, Psychopharmacology and Child Abuse & Neglect.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact