Cope Feurer

586 citations
32 papers · 413 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Cope Feurer

30 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers

Cope Feurer
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 167
  • Clinical Psychology 243
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 38
  • Biological Psychiatry 13
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 98
Replace Kreshnik Burani with:
Kreshnik Burani United States
Bethany C. Wangelin United States
Darcy Mandell United States
Brittany C. Speed United States
Aimee Zisner United States
Ge Xiong China
Martina Bonenberger Germany
Zhaoguo Wei China
Carter J. Funkhouser United States
Stella Berboth Austria
Cope Feurer relative to Kreshnik Burani United States Kreshnik Burani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kreshnik Burani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cope Feurer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cope Feurer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cope Feurer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cope Feurer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cope Feurer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cope Feurer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cope Feurer. The network helps show where Cope Feurer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cope Feurer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cope Feurer Line = papers co-authored together Cope Feurer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201666
2 201644
3 201434
4 202134
5 201729
6 201725
7 201723
8 201715
9 202413
10 201912
11 202111
12 201611
13 202010
14 20219
15 20198
16 20227
17 20177
18 20187
19 20217
20 20227

About Cope Feurer

Cope Feurer is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (20 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (16 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (5 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (167 citations), Clinical Psychology (243 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (38 citations), Biological Psychiatry (13 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (98 citations). Cope Feurer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Bulgaria and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Brandon E. Gibb, Mary L. Woody, Effua E. Sosoo, Anastacia Y. Kudinova, Katie L. Burkhouse, Kiera M. James, Paul D. Hastings, Max Owens, Constance Hammen and K. Luan Phan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Biological Psychology, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Depression and Anxiety and Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact