James D. Palmer

2.1k citations
79 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 19

James D. Palmer

67 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

James D. Palmer
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Neurology 338
  • Ophthalmology 146
  • Internal Medicine 46
  • Genetics 101
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 52
Replace Edward V. Staab with:
Edward V. Staab United States
Young Min Han South Korea
Norlisah Ramli Malaysia
Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo‬‬‬ Brazil
Chang Liu China
Dong Hyun Yoo South Korea
Bob W. van Oosten Netherlands
Farhoud Faraji United States
M. Steinborn Germany
Carson Lam United States
James D. Palmer relative to Edward V. Staab United States Edward V. Staab's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Edward V. Staab · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James D. Palmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James D. Palmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James D. Palmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James D. Palmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James D. Palmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James D. Palmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James D. Palmer. The network helps show where James D. Palmer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James D. Palmer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James D. Palmer Line = papers co-authored together James D. Palmer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202212
2
Prophylactic Ranibizumab for Exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in Vulnerable Eyes with Non-Exudative AMD Trial (PREVENT): A prospective controlled clinical trial
20172
3 201626
4 201522
5
Information technology management of university education: Part 3. A methodology for information system design and development
20140
6
Computer science I with flare
20131
7 201346
8
Touchcasting digital lecture notes
20111
9 20112
10
Writing software to be understood: an exercise in Ginger using literate programming
20100
11 20104
12 201037
13 200323
14 1999143
15 19995
16 199729
17 19941
18 199316
19 19902
20 19906

About James D. Palmer

James D. Palmer is a scholar working on Software, Computer Science Applications and Ophthalmology, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (10 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (9 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (9 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (6 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (5 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (4 papers) and Teaching and Learning Programming (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (338 citations), Ophthalmology (146 citations) and Internal Medicine (46 citations). James D. Palmer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Fausto Iannotti, Owen Sparrow, Neil Dorward, Robert H. Richards, D. G. T. Thomas, Olaf Alberti, Nicholas Clarke, Neil Kitchen, Benjamin Tycko and Jeffrey Sklar. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgery, Retina, Ophthalmology Retina, Injury and Computer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026