Countries where authors publish in Ophthalmology Retina
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ophthalmology Retina. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ophthalmology Retina with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ophthalmology Retina more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Ophthalmology Retina
This network shows the impact of papers published in Ophthalmology Retina. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ophthalmology Retina.
About Ophthalmology Retina
The 1.4k papers published in Ophthalmology Retina in the last decades have received a total of 16.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Ophthalmology Retina usually cover Ophthalmology (1.2k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (822 papers) and Neurology (132 papers) specifically the topics of Retinal Diseases and Treatments (776 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (459 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (422 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (303 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (291 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (237 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (173 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (136 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ophthalmology Retina are Aaron Lee, Cecilia S. Lee, Doug M. Baughman, Philip J. Rosenfeld, Thomas A. Ciulla, David F. Williams, K. Bailey Freund, Charles C. Wykoff, Giovanni Gregori and John S. Pollack.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.