James D. Montgomery

37 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

Social Networks and Labor-Market Outcomes: Toward an Econ...19912026200220141991200400600

Peers

James D. Montgomery
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Sociology and Political Science 948
  • Economics and Econometrics 783
  • Management Science and Operations Research 251
  • Safety Research 176
  • Demography 176
Replace Daniel Diermeier with:
Daniel Diermeier United States
Paul Seabright France
James Samuel Coleman United States
Ángel Cabrera Spain
Robert R. Faulkner United States
Eric M. Leifer United States
Christian Zehnder Switzerland
Marc Knez United States
Michael Suk‐Young Chwe United States
Charles Bram Cadsby Canada
James D. Montgomery relative to Daniel Diermeier United States Daniel Diermeier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Daniel Diermeier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James D. Montgomery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James D. Montgomery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James D. Montgomery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James D. Montgomery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James D. Montgomery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James D. Montgomery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James D. Montgomery. The network helps show where James D. Montgomery may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James D. Montgomery

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James D. Montgomery. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James D. Montgomery based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James D. Montgomery. James D. Montgomery is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 0
3 87
4 0
5 5
6 29
7 10
8
Contemplations on the Economic Approach to Religious Behavior
24
9 60
10 44
11 17
12 92
13
Social Networks and Labor-Market Outcomes: Toward an Economic Analysisbreakdown →
716
14 243
15 18
16 0
17
Some observations on the ecology and phenology of botrychium dissectum in eastern pennsylvania usa
3
18 4
19 4
20 4

About James D. Montgomery

James D. Montgomery is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, General Decision Sciences and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fern and Epiphyte Biology (8 papers), Game Theory and Applications (6 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (783 citations), Biological Psychiatry (69 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (948 citations). James D. Montgomery has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include L.-G. Ste-Marie, Chantal Bémeur, Weidan Peng, James B. DuHadaway, Alexander J. Muller, George C. Prendergast, Lauren M.F. Merlo, Laura Mandik‐Nayak, Andrew J. Caton and Peter J. Murray. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Immunology, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and American Economic Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026