James D. King

750 citations
37 papers · 481 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

James D. King

34 papers receiving 435 citations

Peers

James D. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Public Administration 72
  • Political Science and International Relations 366
  • Gender Studies 83
  • Strategy and Management 113
  • Communication 44
Replace Ronald D. Hedlund with:
Ronald D. Hedlund United States
Timothy B. Krebs United States
Mark P. Petracca United States
Nicholas Aylott Sweden
Gerhard Loewenberg United States
Graeme Orr Australia
Brandon Rottinghaus United States
Stephen J. Wayne United States
Jon H. Pammett Canada
Todd Makse United States
James D. King relative to Ronald D. Hedlund United States Ronald D. Hedlund's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Ronald D. Hedlund · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James D. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James D. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James D. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James D. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James D. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James D. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James D. King. The network helps show where James D. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside James D. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James D. King Line = papers co-authored together James D. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000134
2 200454
3 200343
4 200132
5 198931
6 200230
7 200517
8 198916
9 199614
10 199913
11 201012
12 199110
13 20179
14 19958
15 19818
16 19807
17 20185
18 20145
19 19994
20 20234

About James D. King

James D. King is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Communication, having authored 37 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (22 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (7 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (4 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (3 papers) and Political and Economic history of UK and US (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (72 citations), Political Science and International Relations (366 citations), Gender Studies (83 citations), Strategy and Management (113 citations) and Communication (44 citations). James D. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey Е. Cohen, Aneil F. Agrawal, Wayne Francis, Tobias Kretzschmar, Dennis W. Gleiber, Fanmiao Wang, Terry J. Rose, Matthias Wissuwa, Farzam Farahmand and R. J. Hardy. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Politics, Social Science Quarterly, Presidential Studies Quarterly, Congress & the Presidency and State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact