James D. Griffith

49 papers receiving 741 citations

Peers

James D. Griffith
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Gender Studies 105
  • Clinical Psychology 225
  • Applied Psychology 50
  • Social Psychology 190
  • Epidemiology 231
Replace María del Pilar Sánchez–López with:
María del Pilar Sánchez–López Spain
Silvia Bonino Italy
Silvia Ubillos Landa Spain
Giora Rahav Israel
Abby L. Braitman United States
Valerie Slaymaker United States
Jane A. Noll United States
Jared R. Anderson United States
Marsha Williams United States
Larry C. Bernard United States
James D. Griffith relative to María del Pilar Sánchez–López Spain María del Pilar Sánchez–López's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
María del Pilar Sánchez–López · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James D. Griffith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James D. Griffith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James D. Griffith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James D. Griffith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James D. Griffith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James D. Griffith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James D. Griffith. The network helps show where James D. Griffith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James D. Griffith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James D. Griffith Line = papers co-authored together James D. Griffith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000235
2 199956
3 201237
4 199833
5 199833
6
Satisfaction with Campus Police Services.
200428
7 201227
8 202026
9 202125
10 201322
11 200221
12 201220
13 201420
14 201517
15 200316
16 198116
17
Cognitive Ability and Celebrity Worship Revisited
201214
18 201614
19 200613
20 201311

About James D. Griffith

James D. Griffith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Ocean Engineering, Sociology and Political Science and Gender Studies, having authored 53 papers that have together received 826 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (10 papers), Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (10 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (8 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (8 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (7 papers), Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking (6 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (5 papers) and Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (105 citations), Clinical Psychology (225 citations), Applied Psychology (50 citations), Social Psychology (190 citations) and Epidemiology (231 citations). James D. Griffith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include D. Dwayne Simpson, Christian L. Hart, Grace A. Rowan‐Szal, George W. Joe, Kevin Knight, Matthew L. Hiller, Lynn E. McCutcheon, Danica K. Knight, Thomas Green and Lois R. Chatham. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, International Journal of Sexual Health, Journal of Bisexuality and The Journal of Sex Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact