James Caiels

535 total citations
40 papers, 322 citations indexed

About

James Caiels is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, James Caiels has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 322 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in General Health Professions, 20 papers in Education and 9 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in James Caiels's work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (20 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (14 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers). James Caiels is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare innovation and challenges (20 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (14 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers). James Caiels collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. James Caiels's co-authors include Julien Forder, Julie Beadle‐Brown, Stacey Rand, Ann‐Marie Towers, Karen Windle, Elizabeth Welch, Karen Jones, Alisoun Milne, Ann Netten and Louisa Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and Quality of Life Research.

In The Last Decade

James Caiels

39 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James Caiels United Kingdom 11 251 107 101 57 41 40 322
Elizabeth Welch United Kingdom 8 172 0.7× 67 0.6× 53 0.5× 29 0.5× 25 0.6× 28 254
Vidhya Alakeson United Kingdom 8 182 0.7× 65 0.6× 63 0.6× 23 0.4× 12 0.3× 24 321
Penny Lenihan United Kingdom 10 152 0.6× 31 0.3× 52 0.5× 41 0.7× 23 0.6× 18 299
Bevin Croft United States 9 213 0.8× 52 0.5× 29 0.3× 15 0.3× 16 0.4× 20 275
Eleanor Holding United Kingdom 9 169 0.7× 41 0.4× 33 0.3× 40 0.7× 92 2.2× 29 311
Richard Vergunst South Africa 9 75 0.3× 27 0.3× 29 0.3× 42 0.7× 15 0.4× 16 283
Philip Brigham United Kingdom 8 121 0.5× 19 0.2× 50 0.5× 64 1.1× 67 1.6× 11 309
Daniel Kasprzyk United States 4 104 0.4× 15 0.1× 78 0.8× 64 1.1× 37 0.9× 6 278
Teresa Atkinson United Kingdom 11 184 0.7× 25 0.2× 14 0.1× 64 1.1× 67 1.6× 28 266
Denise Gammonley United States 10 157 0.6× 47 0.4× 10 0.1× 90 1.6× 37 0.9× 31 298

Countries citing papers authored by James Caiels

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Caiels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Caiels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Caiels more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Caiels

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Caiels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Caiels. The network helps show where James Caiels may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Caiels

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Caiels. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Caiels based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Caiels. James Caiels is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Phillipson, Lyn, James Caiels, Louisa Smith, & Ann‐Marie Towers. (2025). Understanding how users of home-based aged care services with cognitive impairment rate their social care related quality of life. BMC Geriatrics. 25(1). 12–12. 1 indexed citations
2.
Rand, Stacey, Nick Smith, Elizabeth Welch, et al.. (2025). Use of the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) in research studies: an international scoping review. Quality of Life Research. 34(9). 2437–2450. 1 indexed citations
3.
Caiels, James, et al.. (2024). Enhancing quality of life measurement: adapting the ASCOT easy read for older adults accessing social care. Quality of Life Research. 34(1). 189–200. 1 indexed citations
4.
Caiels, James, Barbora Šilarova, Alisoun Milne, & Julie Beadle‐Brown. (2023). Strengths-based Approaches—Perspectives from Practitioners. The British Journal of Social Work. 54(1). 168–188. 10 indexed citations
5.
Peters, Michele, Mirza Lalani, Helen Hogan, et al.. (2023). Integrated Care Systems in England: Progress towards forming new multi-stakeholder partnerships to develop quality.. International Journal of Integrated Care. 23(S1). 325–325. 1 indexed citations
6.
Lalani, Mirza, Thavapriya Sugavanam, James Caiels, et al.. (2023). Assessing progress in managing and improving quality in nascent integrated care systems in England. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 29(2). 122–131. 4 indexed citations
7.
Phillipson, Lyn, Ann‐Marie Towers, James Caiels, & Louisa Smith. (2022). Supporting the involvement of older adults with complex needs in evaluation of outcomes in long‐term care at home programmes. Health Expectations. 25(4). 1453–1463. 7 indexed citations
8.
Welch, Elizabeth, et al.. (2022). Personal health budgets: a mechanism to encourage service integration?. Journal of Integrated Care. 30(3). 251–262. 1 indexed citations
9.
Harlock, Jenny, James Caiels, Michele Peters, et al.. (2019). Challenges in integrating health and social care: the Better Care Fund in England. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 25(2). 86–93. 15 indexed citations
11.
Rand, Stacey, et al.. (2019). Feasibility, factor structure and construct validity of the easy-read Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT-ER). Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability. 45(2). 119–132. 15 indexed citations
12.
Rand, Stacey, et al.. (2017). Developing a proxy version of the Adult social care outcome toolkit (ASCOT). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 15(1). 108–108. 26 indexed citations
13.
Caiels, James, Beckie Whelton, Lisa Richardson, et al.. (2016). Developing an Easy Read Version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT). Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 31(1). e36–e48. 25 indexed citations
14.
Malley, Juliette, et al.. (2015). How can MAX help local authorities to use social care data to inform local policy? Maximising the value of survey data in adult social care [MAX] project [Executive Summary]. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent). 2 indexed citations
15.
Baxter, Kate, Caroline Glendinning, Karen Jones, et al.. (2012). Personal health budgets: experiences and outcomes for budget holders at nine months. Fifth interim report.. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent). 11 indexed citations
16.
Forder, Julien & James Caiels. (2011). Measuring the outcomes of long-term care. Social Science & Medicine. 73(12). 1766–1774. 52 indexed citations
17.
Irvine, Annie, Caroline Glendinning, Karen Jones, et al.. (2011). Personal Health Budgets: Early experiences of budget holders. Fourth interim report.. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent). 5 indexed citations
18.
Jones, Karen, Julien Forder, James Caiels, et al.. (2011). The cost of implementing personal health budgets. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent). 4 indexed citations
19.
Malley, Juliette, James Caiels, Nick Smith, et al.. (2010). A report on the developmental studies for theNational Adult Social Care User ExperienceSurvey. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 7 indexed citations
20.
Caiels, James & Miranda Thurston. (2005). Evaluation of the Warrington district CAB GP outreach project. ChesterRep (University of Chester). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026