James C. T. Mao
- Finance top 1%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 2%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Accounting top 5%
- Co-authors
- Wilbur G. LewellenGeorge M. von FurstenbergMark HorowitzAndrew DanowitzJohn P. StevensonCarl Erik SärndalJulian FranksJohn F. Helliwell
- Topics
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (6 papers)Transportation Planning and Optimization (3 papers)Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
James C. T. Mao
34 papers receiving 909 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Finance 519
- Economics and Econometrics 327
- Management Science and Operations Research 272
- Strategy and Management 247
- Accounting 244
Countries citing papers authored by James C. T. Mao
This map shows the geographic impact of James C. T. Mao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. T. Mao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. T. Mao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James C. T. Mao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. T. Mao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. T. Mao. The network helps show where James C. T. Mao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James C. T. Mao
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James C. T. Mao. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James C. T. Mao based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James C. T. Mao. James C. T. Mao is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 85 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | SURVEY OF CAPITAL BUDGETING: THEORY AND PRACTICEbreakdown → | 266 |
| 10 | 137 | |
| 11 | 86 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | Consumer instalment credit and public policy | 4 |
| 20 | 1 |
About James C. T. Mao
James C. T. Mao is a scholar working on Finance, Hardware and Architecture and Transportation, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (6 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (3 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (519 citations), General Decision Sciences (64 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (272 citations). James C. T. Mao has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Wilbur G. Lewellen, George M. von Furstenberg, Mark Horowitz, Andrew Danowitz, John P. Stevenson, Carl Erik Särndal, Julian Franks, John F. Helliwell, Frances Lau and John F. Brewster. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Finance, Management Science and Communications of the ACM.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.