James Brand
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Co-authors
- Dermot LynottLouise ConnellMarc BrysbaertJames CarneyAyelet IsraeliPadraic MonaghanLynn ClarkStephen Worchel
- Topics
- Linguistic Variation and Morphology (3 papers)Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers)Phonetics and Phonology Research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCzechiaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
James Brand
10 papers receiving 319 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 162
- Artificial Intelligence 89
- Social Psychology 86
- Cognitive Neuroscience 67
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 57
Countries citing papers authored by James Brand
This map shows the geographic impact of James Brand's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Brand with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Brand more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Brand
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Brand. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Brand. The network helps show where James Brand may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Brand
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Brand. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Brand based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Brand. James Brand is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Using GPT for Market Researchbreakdown → | 95 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | Go big and go grounded: Categorical structure emerges spontaneously from the latent structure of sensorimotor experience. | 2 |
| 8 | 187 | |
| 9 | Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms | 1 |
| 10 | Multiple variable cues in the environment promote accurate and robust word learning | 5 |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 7 |
About James Brand
James Brand is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Linguistic Variation and Morphology (3 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (162 citations), Health Informatics (12 citations) and General Decision Sciences (11 citations). James Brand has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Czechia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Dermot Lynott, Louise Connell, Marc Brysbaert, James Carney, Ayelet Israeli, Padraic Monaghan, Lynn Clark, Stephen Worchel, Jen Hay and Peter Walker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Cognitive Science and Behavior Research Methods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.