James Ansell
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Jared Torkington (21 shared papers)Neil Warren (13 shared papers)Julie Cornish (6 shared papers)Nicholas Mowbray (2 shared papers)Rhiannon Harries (6 shared papers)James Horwood (8 shared papers)Tarig Abdelrahman (6 shared papers)John Mason (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Colorectal Disease (5 papers)Surgical Endoscopy (5 papers)International Journal of Surgery (4 papers)Health Expectations (3 papers)British journal of surgery (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
James Ansell
49 papers receiving 1.1k citations
James Ansell's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Oncology 288
- Surgery 453
- General Health Professions 124
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 74
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 141
Countries citing papers authored by James Ansell
This map shows the geographic impact of James Ansell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Ansell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Ansell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Ansell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Ansell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Ansell. The network helps show where James Ansell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Ansell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Systematic Review and Meta-Regression of Factors Affecting Midline Incisional Hernia Rates: Analysis of 14 618 Patients Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 252 |
| 2 | 2020 | 134 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 98 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 96 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 89 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 51 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 14 |
About James Ansell
James Ansell is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, General Health Professions, Biomedical Engineering and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surgical Simulation and Training (11 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (7 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (6 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Hernia repair and management (2 papers) and Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (288 citations), Surgery (453 citations), General Health Professions (124 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (74 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (141 citations). James Ansell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jared Torkington, Neil Warren, Julie Cornish, Nicholas Mowbray, Rhiannon Harries, James Horwood, Tarig Abdelrahman, John Mason, David C. Bosanquet and Ian Russell. Their work appears in journals such as Colorectal Disease, Surgical Endoscopy, International Journal of Surgery, Health Expectations and British journal of surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.