Countries citing papers authored by Georges Schadron
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Georges Schadron's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Georges Schadron with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Georges Schadron more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Georges Schadron
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Georges Schadron. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Georges Schadron. The network helps show where Georges Schadron may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Georges Schadron
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Georges Schadron.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Georges Schadron based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Georges Schadron. Georges Schadron is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Yzerbyt, Vincent, Georges Schadron, & Jacques‐Philippe Leyens. (1997). Social judgeability concerns and the dilution of stereotypes. Swiss Journal of Psychology. 56(2). 95–105.4 indexed citations
9.
Yzerbyt, Vincent, et al.. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception..226 indexed citations
Schadron, Georges & Vincent Yzerbyt. (1996). Estereotipos y juicio social. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 113–137.10 indexed citations
12.
Yzerbyt, Vincent & Georges Schadron. (1996). Connaître et juger autrui: Une introduction à la cognition sociale. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).8 indexed citations
13.
Leyens, Jacques‐Philippe, et al.. (1996). Stereotypes and Social Cognition.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 25(3). 402–402.169 indexed citations
14.
Leyens, Jacques‐Philippe, Vincent Yzerbyt, & Georges Schadron. (1996). Stéréotypes et cognition sociale. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).13 indexed citations
Schadron, Georges & Vincent Yzerbyt. (1993). Les stéréotypes et l'approche de la jugeabilité sociale: Un impact des stéréotypes sur le jugement indépendant de leur contenu.. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).6 indexed citations
18.
Leyens, Jacques‐Philippe, Vincent Yzerbyt, & Georges Schadron. (1992). The Social Judgeability Approach to Stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology. 3(1). 91–120.58 indexed citations
19.
Leyens, Jacques‐Philippe, Vincent Yzerbyt, & Georges Schadron. (1992). Stereotypes and social judgeability. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).16 indexed citations
20.
Schadron, Georges & Vincent Yzerbyt. (1991). Social judgeability : another perspective in the study of social inference. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)). 11(2). 229–258.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.