Jacqueline Sims
- Education top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Health
- Co-authors
- Rebekah Levine ColeyCaitlin McPherran LombardiJames R. MahalikAlicia Doyle LynchEric DearingStephanie M. CurentonIheoma U. IrukaJessica Vick Whittaker
- Topics
- Early Childhood Education and Development (13 papers)Parental Involvement in Education (5 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth AfricaIraq
In The Last Decade
Jacqueline Sims
27 papers receiving 355 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Education 129
- Clinical Psychology 127
- General Health Professions 96
- Sociology and Political Science 89
- Health 40
Countries citing papers authored by Jacqueline Sims
This map shows the geographic impact of Jacqueline Sims's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacqueline Sims with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacqueline Sims more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jacqueline Sims
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacqueline Sims. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacqueline Sims. The network helps show where Jacqueline Sims may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacqueline Sims
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacqueline Sims. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacqueline Sims based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacqueline Sims. Jacqueline Sims is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 75 | |
| 16 | 62 | |
| 17 | Early education and care experiences and cognitive skills development: A comparative perspective between Australian and American children | 8 |
| 18 | 41 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Jacqueline Sims
Jacqueline Sims is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Health and Education, having authored 29 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Early Childhood Education and Development (13 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (5 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (127 citations), Health (40 citations) and Applied Psychology (23 citations). Jacqueline Sims has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Iraq. Frequent co-authors include Rebekah Levine Coley, Caitlin McPherran Lombardi, James R. Mahalik, Alicia Doyle Lynch, Eric Dearing, Stephanie M. Curenton, Iheoma U. Iruka, Jessica Vick Whittaker, Elizabeth Votruba‐Drzal and Bryant Jensen. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Social Science & Medicine and Journal of Educational Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.