Jacob Househam

789 total citations
8 papers, 121 citations indexed

About

Jacob Househam is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cancer Research and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Jacob Househam has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 121 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Cancer Research and 2 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Jacob Househam's work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (3 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers). Jacob Househam is often cited by papers focused on Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (3 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers). Jacob Househam collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Jacob Househam's co-authors include Trevor A. Graham, Andrea Sottoriva, Ryan O. Schenck, Mark Robertson‐Tessi, Eszter Lakatos, Alexander R.A. Anderson, C. Barnes, Benjamin Werner, Chandler Gatenbee and Marc Williams and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Nature Genetics and Nature Biotechnology.

In The Last Decade

Jacob Househam

8 papers receiving 120 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jacob Househam United Kingdom	5	61	50	47	30	18	8	121
Dominik Bürri Switzerland	4	85 1.4×	53 1.1×	33 0.7×	73 2.4×	23 1.3×	9	207
Jasmine A. McQuerry United States	7	65 1.1×	52 1.0×	90 1.9×	49 1.6×	12 0.7×	10	167
Sanam Peyvandi Switzerland	5	62 1.0×	33 0.7×	106 2.3×	87 2.9×	8 0.4×	9	182
Lisanne E. Nijman Netherlands	5	60 1.0×	63 1.3×	68 1.4×	9 0.3×	29 1.6×	13	156
Ipsita Dey‐Guha United States	6	130 2.1×	57 1.1×	94 2.0×	29 1.0×	10 0.6×	9	200
Matan Thangavelu Thangavelu Singapore	3	91 1.5×	46 0.9×	50 1.1×	15 0.5×	3 0.2×	5	131
Adina Hughes United Kingdom	5	93 1.5×	23 0.5×	141 3.0×	81 2.7×	10 0.6×	11	204
Ragna S. Häussler Sweden	3	107 1.8×	31 0.6×	70 1.5×	11 0.4×	15 0.8×	3	156
Sara Waise United Kingdom	7	82 1.3×	46 0.9×	87 1.9×	35 1.2×	11 0.6×	9	182
Shumei Chia Singapore	5	98 1.6×	61 1.2×	61 1.3×	21 0.7×	3 0.2×	11	160

Countries citing papers authored by Jacob Househam

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jacob Househam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacob Househam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacob Househam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jacob Househam

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacob Househam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacob Househam. The network helps show where Jacob Househam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacob Househam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacob Househam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacob Househam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacob Househam. Jacob Househam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Duran‐Ferrer, Martí, Diego Mallo, Ferran Nadeu, et al.. (2025). Fluctuating DNA methylation tracks cancer evolution at clinical scale. Nature. 645(8081). 764–773. 2 indexed citations

2.

Lucchini, Sara, James Nicholson, Xinyu Zhang, et al.. (2025). A novel model of glioblastoma recurrence to identify therapeutic vulnerabilities. EMBO Molecular Medicine. 17(6). 1325–1354. 1 indexed citations

3.

Nagy, Ákos, Jacob Househam, Ann‐Marie Baker, et al.. (2024). Profiling of Copy Number Alterations Using Low-Coverage Whole-Genome Sequencing Informs Differential Diagnosis and Prognosis in Primary Cutaneous Follicle Center Lymphoma. Modern Pathology. 37(5). 100465–100465. 4 indexed citations

4.

Househam, Jacob, Marc Williams, Fabio Anselmi, et al.. (2024). Computational validation of clonal and subclonal copy number alterations from bulk tumor sequencing using CNAqc. Genome biology. 25(1). 38–38. 4 indexed citations

5.

Househam, Jacob, et al.. (2023). Phenotypic noise and plasticity in cancer evolution. Trends in Cell Biology. 34(6). 451–464. 16 indexed citations

6.

Schenck, Ryan O., Daniel J. Weisenberger, Christopher Kimberley, et al.. (2022). Fluctuating methylation clocks for cell lineage tracing at high temporal resolution in human tissues. Nature Biotechnology. 40(5). 720–730. 27 indexed citations

7.

Lakatos, Eszter, Marc Williams, Ryan O. Schenck, et al.. (2020). Evolutionary dynamics of neoantigens in growing tumors. Nature Genetics. 52(10). 1057–1066. 60 indexed citations

8.

Hart, Daniel P., et al.. (2018). Factor VIII cross-matches to the human proteome reduce the predicted inhibitor risk in missense mutation hemophilia A. Haematologica. 104(3). 599–608. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact