William Cross

20 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

William Cross
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Cancer Research 191
  • Modeling and Simulation 32
  • Oncology 121
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 63
  • Molecular Biology 191
Replace Kara M. Foshay with:
Kara M. Foshay United States
Ardi Pambuku Italy
Lance Pflieger United States
Jonas Blaes Germany
Princy Parsana United States
Yoshie Umemura United States
Jethro Hu United States
Sara J. Felten United States
Cecilia Krona Sweden
Vera C. Martins Germany
William Cross relative to Kara M. Foshay United States Kara M. Foshay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Kara M. Foshay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Cross

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Cross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Cross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Cross more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Cross

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Cross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Cross. The network helps show where William Cross may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Cross, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Cross Line = papers co-authored together William Cross links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201665
2 202060
3 201658
4 202057
5 201350
6 202033
7 202229
8 202024
9 200819
10 200711
11 202110
12 202110
13
The Counselor, The Mexican American and the Stereotype.
19718
14
Today's Chicano Refutes the Stereotype.
19776
15 20244
16 19754
17 20192
18 20252
19 20211
20
They're Why I'm Dead.
19711

About William Cross

William Cross is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 454 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (11 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (4 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (2 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (191 citations), Modeling and Simulation (32 citations), Oncology (121 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (63 citations) and Molecular Biology (191 citations). William Cross has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Trevor A. Graham, Nicholas A. Wright, Andrea Sottoriva, Marc Williams, C. Barnes, Benjamin Werner, Huw R. Morris, Luís Zapata, Michael J. Owen and Michael O’Donovan. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Nature Genetics, The Journal of Pathology, The Journal of Pathology Clinical Research and Neurobiology of Aging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact