Jack Smith

430 citations
10 papers · 355 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Jack Smith

9 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers

Jack Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • General Materials Science 33
  • Mechanical Engineering 177
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 235
  • Aerospace Engineering 69
  • Biophysics 14
Replace Seong Wook Park with:
Seong Wook Park South Korea
Yongxin Wang China
Charles Blaha United States
J. Otto Germany
Jon Arne Bakken Norway
Y. Seki Japan
Elke Sondermann Germany
А. А. Круглов Russia
В. А. Коротков Russia
A.S. Pokrovsky Russia
Jack Smith relative to Seong Wook Park South Korea Seong Wook Park's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.1×
Seong Wook Park · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Smith. The network helps show where Jack Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Jack Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Smith Line = papers co-authored together Jack Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1994229
2 196334
3 201031
4
Thin film characterization.
198621
5 200914
6 200913
7 199111
8 19881
9 20101
10 20230

About Jack Smith

Jack Smith is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 10 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal and Vascular Pathologies (3 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (3 papers), Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys (2 papers), Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms (1 paper), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (1 paper), Metallurgical and Alloy Processes (1 paper), Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics (1 paper) and Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Materials Science (33 citations), Mechanical Engineering (177 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (235 citations), Aerospace Engineering (69 citations) and Biophysics (14 citations). Jack Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Iver E. Anderson, Maritoni Litorja, Oliver Wrong, Jeffrey A. Cadeddu, Karel J. Zuzak, Chad R. Tracy, M. L. Rosenheim, C. J. Hodson, E.J. Ross and Daniel R. Davies. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Endourology, Journal of Electronic Materials, The Journal of Urology, Nuclear Engineering and Design and The American Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact