Jack J.A. van Asten
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Physiology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Co-authors
- Arend HeerschapTom W. J. ScheenenAndor VeltienDennis W. J. KlompJannie P. WijnenMarnix C. MaasHanneke W.M. van LaarhovenVincent O. Boer
- Topics
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (20 papers)Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers)MRI in cancer diagnosis (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jack J.A. van Asten
33 papers receiving 785 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 397
- Molecular Biology 210
- Physiology 118
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 110
- Spectroscopy 91
Countries citing papers authored by Jack J.A. van Asten
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack J.A. van Asten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack J.A. van Asten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack J.A. van Asten more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack J.A. van Asten
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack J.A. van Asten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack J.A. van Asten. The network helps show where Jack J.A. van Asten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jack J.A. van Asten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jack J.A. van Asten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jack J.A. van Asten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jack J.A. van Asten. Jack J.A. van Asten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 57 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 62 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 62 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 55 | |
| 19 | 42 | |
| 20 | 45 |
About Jack J.A. van Asten
Jack J.A. van Asten is a scholar working on Computational Mathematics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 35 papers that have together received 799 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (20 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers) and MRI in cancer diagnosis (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (397 citations), Neurology (58 citations) and Biophysics (38 citations). Jack J.A. van Asten has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Arend Heerschap, Tom W. J. Scheenen, Andor Veltien, Dennis W. J. Klomp, Jannie P. Wijnen, Marnix C. Maas, Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven, Vincent O. Boer, Hermien E. Kan and Marinette van der Graaf. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Annals of Neurology and Clinical Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.