Jack C. Wright

38 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Jack C. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Applied Psychology 357
  • General Decision Sciences 105
  • Clinical Psychology 1.2k
  • Social Psychology 1.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 588
Replace Phillip Shaver with:
Phillip Shaver United States
Robert M. Arkin United States
John C. Masters United States
Bo Ekehammar Sweden
Bert S. Moore United States
Shelley Duval United States
Eva C. Klohnen United States
Julie K. Norem United States
Monica J. Harris United States
Robert F. Kidd United States
Jack C. Wright relative to Phillip Shaver United States Phillip Shaver's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Phillip Shaver · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack C. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack C. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack C. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack C. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack C. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack C. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack C. Wright. The network helps show where Jack C. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Jack C. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack C. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Jack C. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20142
2 20116
3 201163
4
Measurement of self-enhancement (and self-protection).
201118
5 200547
6 20037
7 200112
8 199936
9 199930
10 1994281
11 198869
12 198865
13 1987232
14 198622
15 1986290
16 198416
17 198479
18 198136
19
Modern criminal justice
19781
20
A behavioral approach to preventing delinquency
19742

About Jack C. Wright

Jack C. Wright is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (13 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (9 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (8 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (357 citations), General Decision Sciences (105 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations), Social Psychology (1.1k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (588 citations). Jack C. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Walter Mischel, Yuichi Shoda, Harry W. Parad, Gregory L. Murphy, Audrey L. Zakriski, Leonard M. Horowitz, Marion K. Underwood, Colleen M. Zeitz, Joachim I. Krueger and Mónica Rodríguez. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Social Cognition, Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026