Jack Arbit

748 total citations
32 papers, 590 citations indexed

About

Jack Arbit is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jack Arbit has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 590 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Clinical Psychology, 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jack Arbit's work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (7 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). Jack Arbit is often cited by papers focused on Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (7 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). Jack Arbit collaborates with scholars based in United States, Philippines and United Kingdom. Jack Arbit's co-authors include Robert John Zagar, John R. Hughes, Kenneth G. Busch, Mary Jean Bach, David L. Bruce, William M. Grove, Benjamin Boshes, E. Richard Blonsky, Michael Bieber and Robert R. Richardson and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Review, Brain Research and Journal of Applied Physiology.

In The Last Decade

Jack Arbit

30 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jack Arbit United States 12 302 222 72 64 61 32 590
Patricia Braun United States 9 126 0.4× 57 0.3× 14 0.2× 11 0.2× 27 0.4× 14 517
K. Thennarasu India 16 79 0.3× 70 0.3× 17 0.2× 33 0.5× 8 0.1× 37 609
Joseph Rigatuso United States 9 443 1.5× 21 0.1× 6 0.1× 11 0.2× 31 0.5× 12 982
Benoît Trojak France 13 125 0.4× 176 0.8× 23 0.3× 10 0.2× 5 0.1× 32 563
Lloyd A. Taylor United States 11 191 0.6× 89 0.4× 7 0.1× 47 0.7× 4 0.1× 15 691
Tricia Zawacki United States 15 106 0.4× 84 0.4× 8 0.1× 81 1.3× 5 0.1× 21 589
Abdul‐Rahman Hudaib Australia 17 300 1.0× 30 0.1× 29 0.4× 15 0.2× 9 0.1× 26 675
Melissa Johnson United States 7 88 0.3× 58 0.3× 5 0.1× 94 1.5× 10 0.2× 15 510
Elizabeth N. Madva United States 12 136 0.5× 23 0.1× 37 0.5× 12 0.2× 15 0.2× 24 491
Murat Rezaki Türkiye 8 170 0.6× 34 0.2× 8 0.1× 55 0.9× 4 0.1× 17 418

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Arbit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Arbit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Arbit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Arbit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Arbit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Arbit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Arbit. The network helps show where Jack Arbit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jack Arbit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jack Arbit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jack Arbit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jack Arbit. Jack Arbit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zagar, Robert John, Kenneth G. Busch, William M. Grove, John R. Hughes, & Jack Arbit. (2009). Looking Forward and Backward in Records for Risks among Homicidal Youth. Psychological Reports. 104(1). 103–127. 35 indexed citations
2.
Busch, Kenneth G., William M. Grove, Jack Arbit, et al.. (2009). Looking forward in Records of Young Adults Convicted of Sexual Homicide, Rape, or Molestation as Youth: Risks for Reoffending. Psychological Reports. 104(1). 155–184. 30 indexed citations
3.
Zagar, Robert John, William M. Grove, Kenneth G. Busch, John R. Hughes, & Jack Arbit. (2009). Looking Forward in Records of Young Adults who were Convicted of Homicide or Assault as Youth: Risks for Reoffending. Psychological Reports. 104(1). 129–154. 16 indexed citations
4.
Zagar, Robert John, William M. Grove, Kenneth G. Busch, John R. Hughes, & Jack Arbit. (2009). Looking Forward in Records of Youth Abused as Infants: Risks for Homicidal, Violent, and Delinquent Offenses. Psychological Reports. 104(1). 47–75. 20 indexed citations
5.
Hughes, John R., Kenneth G. Busch, Robert John Zagar, William M. Grove, & Jack Arbit. (2009). Looking Forward in Records of Youth Abused as Children: Risks for Homicidal, Violent, and Delinquent Offenses. Psychological Reports. 104(1). 77–101. 26 indexed citations
6.
Hughes, John R., et al.. (1991). Medical, family, and scholastic conditions in urban delinquents. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 47(3). 448–464. 19 indexed citations
7.
Busch, Kenneth G., et al.. (1990). Adolescents who kill. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 46(4). 472–485. 84 indexed citations
8.
Zagar, Robert John, et al.. (1990). Homicidal Adolescents: A Replication. Psychological Reports. 67(3_suppl). 1235–1242. 49 indexed citations
9.
Zagar, Robert John, et al.. (1989). Developmental and Disruptive Behavior Disorders among Delinquents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 28(3). 437–440. 36 indexed citations
10.
Zagar, Robert John, et al.. (1984). Developmental analysis of the Wechsler Memory Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 40(6). 1466–1473. 9 indexed citations
11.
Richardson, Robert R., Jack Arbit, Edir B. Siqueira, & Robert John Zagar. (1981). Transcutaneous Electrical Neurostimulation in Functional Pain. Spine. 6(2). 185–188. 11 indexed citations
12.
Richardson, Robert R., Jack Arbit, & Robert John Zagar. (1980). Evaluation of transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 24(2). 79–83. 7 indexed citations
13.
Zagar, Robert John, et al.. (1980). Structure of a psychodiagnostic test battery for children. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 36(1). 313–318. 7 indexed citations
14.
Arbit, Jack & Robert John Zagar. (1979). The Effects of Age and Sex on the Factor Structure of the Wechsler Memory Scale. The Journal of Psychology. 102(2). 185–190. 4 indexed citations
15.
Zeller, E. A., et al.. (1976). Molecular biology of neurological and psychiatric disorders. I. Effect of parkinsonism, age, sex and L-dopa on platelet monoamine oxidase. Journal of Neural Transmission. 39(1-2). 63–77. 33 indexed citations
16.
Oh, William, et al.. (1971). Neurologic and psychometric follow-up study of Rh-erythroblastotic infants requiring intrauterine blood transfusion. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 110(3). 330–335. 9 indexed citations
17.
Boshes, Benjamin, et al.. (1969). Effect of L-dopa on individual symptoms of parkinsonism.. PubMed. 94. 229–31. 3 indexed citations
18.
Arbit, Jack. (1961). Emotionality and avoidance conditioning to X radiation.. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 54(6). 653–657. 2 indexed citations
19.
Arbit, Jack. (1958). Avoidance conditioning through irradiation: A note on physiological mechanisms and psychological implications.. Psychological Review. 65(3). 167–169. 6 indexed citations
20.
Arbit, Jack. (1957). Effects of LSD-25 Upon Betta splendens: Reliability of a Bioassay Technique. Journal of Applied Physiology. 10(2). 317–318. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026