Jaap Hage
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Law top 0.5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Topics
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (23 papers)Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (18 papers)Law in Society and Culture (15 papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Human-Computer StudiesStudia LogicaArtificial Intelligence and Law
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jaap Hage
59 papers receiving 667 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Artificial Intelligence 430
- Political Science and International Relations 355
- Law 258
- Economics and Econometrics 92
- Strategy and Management 76
Countries citing papers authored by Jaap Hage
This map shows the geographic impact of Jaap Hage's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaap Hage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaap Hage more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jaap Hage
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaap Hage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaap Hage. The network helps show where Jaap Hage may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jaap Hage
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jaap Hage. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jaap Hage based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jaap Hage. Jaap Hage is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Logical techniques for international law | 0 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | The justification of value judgments. Theoretical foundations for arguments about the best level to regulate European private law | 1 |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | Juridical Acts and the Gap between Is and Ought | 1 |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | Recht als sociaal feit en recht als praktische rede | 0 |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | Martin van Hees, Legal Reductionism and Freedom, Dordrecht | 4 |
| 12 | Contary to duty obligations - A study in legal entology | 3 |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | Goal-based theory evaluation | 7 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 37 | |
| 17 | Reasoning with rules : an essay on legal reasoning and its underlying logic | 80 |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | Intelligent information retrieval from multiple databases | 1 |
About Jaap Hage
Jaap Hage is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 68 papers that have together received 782 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (23 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (18 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (258 citations), Political Science and International Relations (355 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (430 citations). Jaap Hage has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bart Verheij, A.R. Lodder, Ronald Leenes, H.J. van den Herik, Aleksander Peczenik and Giovanni Sartor. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Studia Logica and Artificial Intelligence and Law.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.