951 total citations 45 papers, 375 citations indexed
About
Aleksander Peczenik is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Philosophy.
According to data from OpenAlex, Aleksander Peczenik has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 375 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Law, 14 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 7 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Aleksander Peczenik's work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (7 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers) and European and International Law Studies (7 papers). Aleksander Peczenik is often cited by papers focused on Judicial and Constitutional Studies (7 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers) and European and International Law Studies (7 papers). Aleksander Peczenik collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Netherlands and Poland. Aleksander Peczenik's co-authors include Robert Alexy, Jaap Hage, G.C.G.J. van Roermund, Lars Lindahl, Iredell Jenkins, Aulis Aarnio and Jerzy Wróblewski and has published in prestigious journals such as Noûs, Ethics and Artificial Intelligence and Law.
Citations per year, relative to Aleksander Peczenik Aleksander Peczenik (= 1×)
peers
Ota Weinberger
Countries citing papers authored by Aleksander Peczenik
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Aleksander Peczenik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aleksander Peczenik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aleksander Peczenik more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Aleksander Peczenik
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aleksander Peczenik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aleksander Peczenik. The network helps show where Aleksander Peczenik may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aleksander Peczenik
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aleksander Peczenik.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aleksander Peczenik based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Aleksander Peczenik. Aleksander Peczenik is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Peczenik, Aleksander. (2008). On Law and Reason. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).17 indexed citations
2.
Peczenik, Aleksander. (2005). Scientia juris : legal doctrine as knowledge of law and as a sources of law. Springer eBooks.6 indexed citations
3.
Peczenik, Aleksander. (2003). Legal doctrine and legal theory. Lund University Publications (Lund University).2 indexed citations
4.
Peczenik, Aleksander. (2003). Stan obecny teorii i filozofii prawa w krajach zachodnich. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 9–14.1 indexed citations
5.
Peczenik, Aleksander & Jaap Hage. (2001). Legal Knowledge about What.
6.
Hage, Jaap & Aleksander Peczenik. (2000). Law, Morals and Defeasibility. Ratio Juris. 13(3). 305–325.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.