J. Yeh

930 citations
30 papers · 703 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

J. Yeh

26 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

J. Yeh
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Applied Mathematics 304
  • Mathematical Physics 260
  • Algebra and Number Theory 52
  • Finance 109
  • Numerical Analysis 55
Replace V. Tarieladze with:
V. Tarieladze Georgia
Izumi Kubo Japan
M. M. Rao United States
J. Hoffmann-Jørgensen Denmark
Eugene Lukács United States
Antoni Zygmund United States
Yu. V. Prokhorov Russia
Heinz Bauer Germany
E. J. McShane United States
Iosif Pinelis United States
J. Yeh relative to V. Tarieladze Georgia V. Tarieladze's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
V. Tarieladze · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Yeh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Yeh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Yeh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Yeh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Yeh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Yeh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Yeh. The network helps show where J. Yeh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside J. Yeh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Yeh Line = papers co-authored together J. Yeh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Real Analysis: Theory of Measure and Integration
200672
2 197468
3 196067
4 197566
5 198159
6 196557
7 196349
8 201238
9 197135
10 196333
11 196927
12 198724
13 200023
14 199519
15 199517
16 197813
17 198511
18 19676
19 19896
20 19652

About J. Yeh

J. Yeh is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Finance, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Numerical Analysis, having authored 30 papers that have together received 703 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stochastic processes and financial applications (8 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (7 papers), Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (7 papers), Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods (6 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (5 papers), advanced mathematical theories (5 papers), Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (3 papers) and Physics and Engineering Research Articles (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (304 citations), Mathematical Physics (260 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (52 citations), Finance (109 citations) and Numerical Analysis (55 citations). J. Yeh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Marc Uemura, David Nualart and William N. Hudson. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Tohoku Mathematical Journal and Journal of Multivariate Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact