J. W. Loder
Impact in
- Horticulture top 10%
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Synthesis and Reactivity of Sulfur-Containing Compounds 3
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 2
- Synthesis and biological activity 2
-
- Biological Stains and Phytochemicals 3
- Co-authors
- Derrick L. J. Clive (1 shared paper)David Dolphin (1 shared paper)R. B. Woodward (1 shared paper)Francis L. Harris (1 shared paper)Victor J. Bauer (1 shared paper)John B. Paine (1 shared paper)Michael M. King (1 shared paper)Albert W. H. Mau (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Tetrahedron Letters (4 papers)Phytochemistry (2 papers)Polymer Degradation and Stability (2 papers)Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)Israel Journal of Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
J. W. Loder
25 papers receiving 504 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Horticulture 14
- Biochemistry 56
- Bioengineering 43
- Organic Chemistry 205
- Electrochemistry 42
Countries citing papers authored by J. W. Loder
This map shows the geographic impact of J. W. Loder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. W. Loder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. W. Loder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. W. Loder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. W. Loder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. W. Loder. The network helps show where J. W. Loder may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. W. Loder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1983 | 239 | |
| 2 | 1977 | 49 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 31 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 29 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 23 | |
| 6 | 1957 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1966 | 15 | |
| 8 | 1954 | 14 | |
| 9 | 1972 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1971 | 13 | |
| 11 | 1982 | 12 | |
| 12 | 1968 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1972 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 9 | |
| 15 | 1975 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1958 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1956 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1955 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1972 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 4 |
About J. W. Loder
J. W. Loder is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Bioengineering, having authored 25 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (4 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (4 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (3 papers), Synthesis and Reactivity of Sulfur-Containing Compounds (3 papers), Biological Stains and Phytochemicals (3 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (2 papers) and Synthesis and biological activity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (14 citations), Biochemistry (56 citations), Bioengineering (43 citations), Organic Chemistry (205 citations) and Electrochemistry (42 citations). J. W. Loder has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Derrick L. J. Clive, David Dolphin, R. B. Woodward, Francis L. Harris, Victor J. Bauer, John B. Paine, Michael M. King, Albert W. H. Mau, W. H. F. Sasse and J. Cymerman‐Craig. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, Phytochemistry, Polymer Degradation and Stability, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Israel Journal of Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.