Michael M. King

595 citations
17 papers · 486 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Michael M. King

14 papers receiving 462 citations

Peers

Michael M. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Organic Chemistry 244
  • Inorganic Chemistry 105
  • Materials Chemistry 241
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 46
  • Spectroscopy 65
Replace A. C. VERONESE with:
A. C. VERONESE Italy
Kyle W. K. Chan Hong Kong
G. Valle Italy
Jürgen Fink United States
Bryden A. F. Le Bailly United Kingdom
Andreas Ehnbom United States
Tatsuo Oshikawa Japan
Casey J. Massena United States
G. Valle Italy
Komala Pandurangan Ireland
Michael M. King relative to A. C. VERONESE Italy A. C. VERONESE's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
A. C. VERONESE · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael M. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael M. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael M. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael M. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael M. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael M. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael M. King. The network helps show where Michael M. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Michael M. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael M. King Line = papers co-authored together Michael M. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1983239
2 199960
3 199739
4 199129
5 198328
6 197624
7 199722
8
Differential habitat utilization by the sexes of mule deer
198015
9 200415
10
Bridging the gap – student understanding and the chemistry bridging course
20124
11 19784
12 19744
13 19752
14
Still pictures, animations or interactivity – What is more effective for elearning?
20121
15 20210
16 19990
17
DEER DAMAGE IN TENNESSEE: LANDOWNER PERCEPTIONS AND ATTITUDES
19930

About Michael M. King

Michael M. King is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Ecology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (4 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers), Aldose Reductase and Taurine (2 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (1 paper), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (1 paper), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (1 paper) and Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (244 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (105 citations), Materials Chemistry (241 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (46 citations) and Spectroscopy (65 citations). Michael M. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Louis A. Cohen, Victor J. Bauer, Derrick L. J. Clive, John B. Paine, J. W. Loder, David Dolphin, R. B. Woodward, Francis L. Harris, Rita Labroo and Rahul Jain. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Tetrahedron Letters and Crystal Growth & Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact