J. Thomas Cox
Impact in
- Epidemiology top 0.5%
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Hepatitis B Virus Studies
- Microbiology top 1%
- Reproductive tract infections research
Papers in
-
- Optical Coatings and Gratings 13
- Epidemiology 62
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research 62
- Co-authors
- Mark SchiffmanThomas C. WrightEdward J. WilkinsonMark E. ShermanDiane SolomonPhilip E. CastleG. HassL. Stewart Massad
- Journals
- Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease (20 papers)Obstetrics and Gynecology (5 papers)American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (4 papers)Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America (3 papers)International Journal of Cancer (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
J. Thomas Cox
106 papers receiving 5.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
- Epidemiology 4.0k
- Microbiology 458
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 533
- Surgery 2.1k
- Oncology 1.0k
Countries citing papers authored by J. Thomas Cox
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Thomas Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Thomas Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Thomas Cox more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Thomas Cox
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Thomas Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Thomas Cox. The network helps show where J. Thomas Cox may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Thomas Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 2 | The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization Project for HPV-associated Lesions Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 385 |
| 3 | 2012 | 321 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 60 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 56 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 37 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 198 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 391 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 265 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 36 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 98 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 211 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 35 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 192 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 48 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 24 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 44 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 336 |
About J. Thomas Cox
J. Thomas Cox is a scholar working on Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 108 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (62 papers), Genital Health and Disease (26 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (16 papers), Optical Coatings and Gratings (13 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (10 papers), Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (7 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (7 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Epidemiology (4.0k citations), Microbiology (458 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (533 citations), Surgery (2.1k citations) and Oncology (1.0k citations). J. Thomas Cox has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark Schiffman, Thomas C. Wright, Edward J. Wilkinson, Mark E. Sherman, Diane Solomon, Philip E. Castle, G. Hass, L. Stewart Massad, Leo B. Twiggs and Henry C Kitchener. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America and International Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.