Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Gupta Rk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gupta Rk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gupta Rk more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gupta Rk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gupta Rk. The network helps show where Gupta Rk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gupta Rk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gupta Rk.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gupta Rk based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gupta Rk. Gupta Rk is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pandey, Kiran, et al.. (2020). A Review of Cases of Peripartum Hysterectomy: Five Year Experience at Tertiary Care Centre in North India. 10(1).1 indexed citations
5.
Isbrucker, Richard, Camille Locht, Juan Arciniega, et al.. (2016). In search of acceptable alternatives to the murine histamine sensitisation test (HIST): what is possible and practical?. PubMed. 2016. 151–170.6 indexed citations
6.
Rk, Gupta, et al.. (2014). Tetanus Booster -A missed opportunity. Indian Journal of Community Health. 26(2). 200–201.
Rk, Gupta, et al.. (1991). Production of a safe, potent and immunogenic partially purified acellular pertussis vaccine using simple indigenous techniques.. PubMed. 73. 205–22.4 indexed citations
13.
Rk, Gupta, et al.. (1990). Adenolymphoma of lacrimal sac. A case report.. PubMed. 27(2). 116–8.1 indexed citations
14.
Rk, Gupta, et al.. (1987). Glutaraldehyde Inactivated Pertussis Vaccine. A safe, potent and stable vaccine.. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 5(2). 85.2 indexed citations
15.
Chaturvedi, Pankaj, et al.. (1978). Sickle cell anaemia with Salmonella empyema thoracis: (a case report).. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 15(7). 605–6.7 indexed citations
16.
Rk, Gupta, et al.. (1978). Leukaemia in children.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 15(9). 755–9.1 indexed citations
17.
Rk, Gupta, et al.. (1977). Cytologic diagnosis of primary squamous cell carcinoma of Bartholin's gland.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 21(2). 303–5.2 indexed citations
18.
Rk, Gupta & Parakriti Gupta. (1977). Cystic ovarian teratoma in a girl of 5 years presenting as acute intestinal obstruction.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 68(11). 235–6.3 indexed citations
Gupta, Sonia, et al.. (1976). Studies on the toxic effects of streptolysin 'O': effect on the contractility of isolated and intact mammalian and amphibian heart.. PubMed. 20(3). 164–7.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.