J. Sherma
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Analytical Chemistry top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology top 10%
- Parasitology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Bernard FriedFrederick H. KastenJoseph C. TouchstoneCarmen J. MarsitGUNTER ZWEIGRobert A. SteinerJames D. VastaSteven E. Keller
- Topics
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (33 papers)Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (15 papers)Parasites and Host Interactions (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
J. Sherma
75 papers receiving 686 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Spectroscopy 264
- Analytical Chemistry 171
- Molecular Biology 143
- Ecology 133
- Parasitology 98
Countries citing papers authored by J. Sherma
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Sherma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Sherma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Sherma more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Sherma
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Sherma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Sherma. The network helps show where J. Sherma may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Sherma
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Sherma. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Sherma based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Sherma. J. Sherma is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Analysis of counterfeit drugs by thin layer chromatography | 10 |
| 2 | COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF SILICA GEL TLC PLATES AND IRREGULAR AND SPHERICAL-PARTICLE HPTLC PLATES | 7 |
| 3 | DETERMINATION OF SALICYLAMIDE IN PHARMACEUTICAL TABLETS BY HIGH-PERFORMANCE THIN-LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH ULTRAVIOLET ABSORPTION DENSITOMETRY | 3 |
| 4 | Use of the Chromimage flatbed scanner for quantification of high-performance thin layer chromatograms in the visible and fluorescence-quenching modes | 6 |
| 5 | THIN-LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY OF PESTICIDES - A REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS FOR 2002-2004 | 20 |
| 6 | DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF AN HPTLC-DENSITOMETRY METHOD FOR ASSAY OF GLUCOSAMINE OF DIFFERENT FORMS IN DIETARY SUPPLEMENT TABLETS AND CAPSULES | 4 |
| 7 | Thin-layer chromatographic analysis of hydrophilic vitamins in standards and from Helisoma trivolvis snails | 9 |
| 8 | QUANTIFICATION OF ARGININE IN DIETARY SUPPLEMENT TABLETS AND CAPSULES BY SILICA GEL HIGH-PERFORMANCE THIN-LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH VISIBLE MODE DENSITOMETRY | 25 |
| 9 | Development and validation of a high-performance thin-layer chromatographic method with densitometric detection for determination of bisacodyl in pharmaceutical tablets | 3 |
| 10 | COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PRECOATED SILICA GEL PLATES FOR PREPARATIVE LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY | 3 |
| 11 | Analysis of the caffeine in alertness tablets and caplets by high-performance thin-layer chromatography with ultraviolet absorption densitometry of fluorescence-quenched zones | 2 |
| 12 | Quantification of lutein in dietary supplements by reversed-phase high-performance thin-layer chromatography with visible-mode densitometry | 3 |
| 13 | Thin layer chromatographic analysis of carbohydrates and amino acids in Schistosoma mansoni (Trematoda) cercariae | 4 |
| 14 | Analysis of carisoprodol tablets by HPTLC with visible absorbance densitometry | 3 |
| 15 | Determination of the sunscreen octyl salicylate in lotions by reversed-phase high-performance thin layer chromatography and ultraviolet absorption densitometry | 3 |
| 16 | Quantification of dextromethorphan hydrobromide and clemastine fumarate in pharmaceutical caplets, gelcaps, and tablets by HPTLC with ultraviolet absorption densitometry | 2 |
| 17 | Determination of the sunscreen 2-ethylhexyl-p-methoxycinnamate in cosmetics by reversed-phase HPTLC with ultraviolet absorption densitometry on preadsorbent plates | 1 |
| 18 | REVIEW: DETERMINATION OF PESTICIDES BY THIN – LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY | 2 |
| 19 | 飲料中のアスパルテームの薄層クロマトグラフ(TLC)定量 | 3 |
| 20 | Detection and quantitation of anilines by TLC using fluorescamine reagent. | 7 |
About J. Sherma
J. Sherma is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Parasitology, having authored 77 papers that have together received 749 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (33 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (15 papers) and Parasites and Host Interactions (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (171 citations), Spectroscopy (264 citations) and Parasitology (98 citations). J. Sherma has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Bernard Fried, Frederick H. Kasten, Joseph C. Touchstone, Carmen J. Marsit, GUNTER ZWEIG, Robert A. Steiner, James D. Vasta, Steven E. Keller, Harry Smith and Sumit Mishra. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Journal of Chromatography A and Talanta.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.