Talanta
About
In The Last Decade
Talanta
29.5k papers receiving 753.2k citations
Fields of papers published in Talanta
This network shows the impact of papers published in Talanta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Talanta.
Countries where authors publish in Talanta
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Talanta. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Talanta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Talanta more than expected).
- Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry (2008)
- Investigation of equilibria in solution. Determination of equilibrium constants with the HYPERQUAD suite of programs (1996)
- Arsenic round the world: a review (2002)
- A new tool for the evaluation of the analytical procedure: Green Analytical Procedure Index (2018)
- Analysis of anticancer drugs: A review (2011)
- Current trends in explosive detection techniques (2011)
- Dummy molecularly imprinted polymers based on a green synthesis strategy for magnetic solid-phase extraction of acrylamide in food samples (2018)
- Atomic spectrometric methods for the determination of metals and metalloids in automotive fuels – A review (2007)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.