J. Scott Armstrong

4.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
125 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

J. Scott Armstrong is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Scott Armstrong has authored 125 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 65 papers in Insect Science, 64 papers in Plant Science and 46 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in J. Scott Armstrong's work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (51 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (30 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (22 papers). J. Scott Armstrong is often cited by papers focused on Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (51 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (30 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (22 papers). J. Scott Armstrong collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. J. Scott Armstrong's co-authors include Adrian J. Gibbs, Mark J. Gibbs, Peter J. M. Rottier, Sjef Smeekens, Douglas R. Drummond, Alan Colman, Graham Warren, B A van der Zeijst, John M. Hancock and Michael J. Brewer and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

J. Scott Armstrong

119 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Hit Papers

Sister-Scanning: a Monte Carlo procedure for assessing si... 2000 2026 2008 2017 2000 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Scott Armstrong United States 28 1.4k 1.1k 924 797 645 125 3.6k
Mark J. Gibbs Australia 24 1.8k 1.2× 658 0.6× 355 0.4× 500 0.6× 348 0.5× 46 3.0k
Hélène Sanfaçon Canada 29 2.6k 1.8× 1.0k 0.9× 511 0.6× 607 0.8× 377 0.6× 79 3.6k
Pierre Lefeuvre France 33 3.5k 2.4× 716 0.6× 841 0.9× 499 0.6× 538 0.8× 117 4.8k
M. A. Mayo United Kingdom 32 2.6k 1.8× 762 0.7× 590 0.6× 490 0.6× 371 0.6× 96 3.6k
M. J. Adams United Kingdom 21 1.4k 1.0× 439 0.4× 259 0.3× 1.3k 1.6× 726 1.1× 52 3.2k
Brejnev Muhire United States 16 2.9k 2.0× 535 0.5× 601 0.7× 1.1k 1.4× 1.1k 1.7× 24 4.5k
Siobain Duffy United States 31 2.2k 1.5× 828 0.7× 451 0.5× 804 1.0× 930 1.4× 78 4.2k
Xiao Chen China 14 823 0.6× 478 0.4× 472 0.5× 964 1.2× 326 0.5× 54 2.4k
D. Peters Netherlands 37 3.4k 2.4× 556 0.5× 1.5k 1.6× 740 0.9× 594 0.9× 135 4.3k
Peter M. Takvorian United States 26 454 0.3× 900 0.8× 378 0.4× 723 0.9× 333 0.5× 65 3.1k

Countries citing papers authored by J. Scott Armstrong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Scott Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Scott Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Scott Armstrong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Scott Armstrong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Scott Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Scott Armstrong. The network helps show where J. Scott Armstrong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Scott Armstrong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Scott Armstrong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Scott Armstrong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Scott Armstrong. J. Scott Armstrong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hoback, W. Wyatt, et al.. (2023). Effects of Temperature and Host Plant on Hedgehog Grain Aphid, Sipha maydis Demographics. Insects. 14(11). 862–862. 1 indexed citations
2.
Xu, Xiangyang, D. W. Mornhinweg, Guihua Bai, et al.. (2023). Identification of a new Rsg1 allele conferring resistance to multiple greenbug biotypes from barley accessions PI 499276 and PI 566459. The Plant Genome. 17(1). e20418–e20418. 1 indexed citations
3.
Xu, Xiangyang, Genqiao Li, Guihua Bai, et al.. (2023). Genomic location of Gb1, a unique gene conferring wheat resistance to greenbug biotype F. The Crop Journal. 11(5). 1595–1599. 2 indexed citations
4.
Muleta, Kebede T., J. Scott Armstrong, Sujan Mamidi, et al.. (2022). The recent evolutionary rescue of a staple crop depended on over half a century of global germplasm exchange. Science Advances. 8(6). eabj4633–eabj4633. 17 indexed citations
5.
Punnuri, Somashekhar, Karen R. Harris‐Shultz, J. Knoll, et al.. (2022). Genome-wide association mapping of resistance to the sorghum aphid in Sorghum bicolor. Genomics. 114(4). 110408–110408. 13 indexed citations
6.
Xu, Xiangyang, D. W. Mornhinweg, Guihua Bai, et al.. (2022). Characterization of Rsg3 , a novel greenbug resistance gene from the Chinese barley landrace PI 565676. The Plant Genome. 16(1). e20287–e20287. 7 indexed citations
7.
Xu, Xiangyang, Genqiao Li, Guihua Bai, et al.. (2020). Development of KASP markers for wheat greenbug resistance gene Gb5. Crop Science. 61(1). 490–499. 6 indexed citations
8.
Armstrong, J. Scott, et al.. (2019). Sunflower stem weevil management. Digital Collections of Colorado (Colorado State University).
10.
Armstrong, J. Scott, et al.. (2009). Comparative efficacy of selected insecticide alternatives for boll weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) control using laboratory bioassays.. ˜The œjournal of cotton science/Journal of cotton science. 13(3). 189–195. 1 indexed citations
11.
Armstrong, J. Scott, Neil Bone, James Dodgson, & Tim Beck. (2007). The role and aims of the FYSSION project. Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics. 6(1). 3–7. 2 indexed citations
12.
Armstrong, J. Scott, et al.. (2003). Economic Evaluation of Short Season Bollgard Cotton Cultivars on the Texas High Plains. 16. 78–85. 3 indexed citations
13.
Armstrong, J. Scott, et al.. (2000). An inventory of the key predators of cotton pests on Bt and non-Bt cotton in West Texas.. 1030–1033. 10 indexed citations
14.
Armstrong, J. Scott & David C. Nielsen. (2000). Supercooling points for Russian wheat aphid and winter wheat tissue as indicators of cold acclimation.. Southwestern Entomologist. 25(4). 265–272. 1 indexed citations
15.
Armstrong, J. Scott. (1997). New host records for Cosmobaris americana Casey (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and its parasite Neocatolaccus tylodermae Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae).. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 70(3). 258–260. 6 indexed citations
16.
Armstrong, J. Scott, et al.. (1995). Two chloropid flies (Diptera: Chloropidae) infesting proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in northeastern Colorado. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 68(4). 478–480. 3 indexed citations
17.
Elliott, Norman C., et al.. (1995). Release and recovery of imported parasitoids of the Russian wheat aphid in eastern Colorado.. Southwestern Entomologist. 20(2). 125–129. 21 indexed citations
18.
Armstrong, J. Scott, et al.. (1993). The effect of planting time insecticides and liquid fertilizer on the Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) and the lesion nematode (Pratylenchus thornei) on winter wheat.. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 66(1). 69–74. 21 indexed citations
19.
Donnelly, J. R., et al.. (1978). Simulation of grazing systems.. 41 indexed citations
20.
Freer, M., JL Davidson, J. Scott Armstrong, & J. R. Donnelly. (1970). Simulation of summer grazing.. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026