J. S. Frame

1.7k citations
36 papers · 880 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

J. S. Frame

34 papers receiving 720 citations

Peers

J. S. Frame
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 455
  • Algebra and Number Theory 198
  • Geometry and Topology 287
  • Mathematical Physics 220
  • Computational Mathematics 7
Replace J.W. Nienhuys with:
J.W. Nienhuys Netherlands
Gérard Viennot France
Dragomir Ž. Djoković Canada
William Hobson Mills United States
P. R. Stein United States
Roe Goodman United States
Emeric Deutsch United States
Jay R. Goldman United States
Andy R. Magid United States
G. de B. Robinson Canada
J. S. Frame relative to J.W. Nienhuys Netherlands J.W. Nienhuys's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
J.W. Nienhuys · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. S. Frame

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. S. Frame's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. S. Frame with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. S. Frame more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. S. Frame

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. S. Frame. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. S. Frame. The network helps show where J. S. Frame may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside J. S. Frame, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. S. Frame Line = papers co-authored together J. S. Frame links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1961241
2 1954223
3 1973121
4 195171
5 199825
6 197223
7 196422
8 197418
9 195314
10 196412
11 19648
12 19668
13 19768
14 19648
15 19758
16 19647
17 19576
18 19836
19 19805
20 19795

About J. S. Frame

J. S. Frame is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Mathematical Physics and Numerical Analysis, having authored 36 papers that have together received 880 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (7 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (4 papers), Mathematics and Applications (3 papers), Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations (3 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (3 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (2 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications (2 papers) and Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (455 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (198 citations), Geometry and Topology (287 citations), Mathematical Physics (220 citations) and Computational Mathematics (7 citations). J. S. Frame has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include G. de B. Robinson, Robert Thrall, William A. Simpson, Paul Frame, Richard J. Reid, L. J. Segerlind, H. E. Koenig, Dennis Gilliland, G. D. Anderson and James R. Weaver. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Mathematics, American Mathematical Monthly, Duke Mathematical Journal, Journal of Applied Mechanics and Journal of Theoretical Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact