J. S. Cockburn

1.0k citations
17 papers · 546 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 11
Topics
Historical Economic and Social Studies (6 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers)Historical Economic and Legal Thought (5 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

J. S. Cockburn

14 papers receiving 318 citations

Hit Papers

A Just Measure of Pain: The Penitentiary in the Industria...1979202619942010197950100150200

Peers

J. S. Cockburn
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Sociology and Political Science 235
  • Economics and Econometrics 192
  • History 169
  • Political Science and International Relations 129
  • Anthropology 89
Replace Pieter Spierenburg with:
Pieter Spierenburg Netherlands
Richard T. Vann United States
Guido De Ruggiero United States
Barry Reay New Zealand
Robert Tittler Canada
James Grantham Turner United States
John Rule United States
William Monter Philippines
Lyndal Roper United Kingdom
A. L. Beier Ghana
J. S. Cockburn relative to Pieter Spierenburg Netherlands Pieter Spierenburg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Pieter Spierenburg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. S. Cockburn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. S. Cockburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. S. Cockburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. S. Cockburn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. S. Cockburn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. S. Cockburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. S. Cockburn. The network helps show where J. S. Cockburn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. S. Cockburn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. S. Cockburn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. S. Cockburn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. S. Cockburn. J. S. Cockburn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 12
2 67
3 16
4 0
5 11
6
Surrey indictments, James I
0
7 40
8 29
9
Kent indictments, Elizabeth I
0
10
A Just Measure of Pain: The Penitentiary in the Industrial Revolution, 1750-1850breakdown →
208
11 72
12 17
13 24
14 42
15 3
16 1
17 4

About J. S. Cockburn

J. S. Cockburn is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations and Anthropology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (6 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers) and Historical Economic and Legal Thought (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (169 citations), Anthropology (89 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (192 citations). J. S. Cockburn has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Ignatieff, Thomas A. Green, Michael Weisser, Glanmor Williams, Margaret DeLacy, Alan Macfarlane and Sarah Harrison. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Economic History Review and Past & Present.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026