J. N. de Vries
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Food Science top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- R.J. BinoW. J. FeenstraBernard WitholtJohanna Hovenkamp-HermelinkW. A. WietsmaE. JacobsenP. AdamseJ. Sybenga
- Topics
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (13 papers)Garlic and Onion Studies (12 papers)Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
J. N. de Vries
26 papers receiving 821 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Plant Science 758
- Molecular Biology 297
- Nutrition and Dietetics 194
- Food Science 113
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 80
Countries citing papers authored by J. N. de Vries
This map shows the geographic impact of J. N. de Vries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. N. de Vries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. N. de Vries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. N. de Vries
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. N. de Vries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. N. de Vries. The network helps show where J. N. de Vries may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. N. de Vries
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. N. de Vries. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. N. de Vries based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. N. de Vries. J. N. de Vries is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Allium roylei Stearn restores cytoplasmic male sterility of Rijnsburger onion (A. cepa L.) | 5 |
| 3 | 45 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | Introgression of characters from Allium roylei Stearn into A. cepa L. | 6 |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | Interstitial C-bands on the chromosomes of Allium-species from the section cepa | 10 |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 156 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | Chromosomal location of 17 monogenically inherited morphological markers in rye (Secale cereale L.) using the translocation tester set | 56 |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About J. N. de Vries
J. N. de Vries is a scholar working on Plant Science, Genetics and Food Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 905 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (13 papers), Garlic and Onion Studies (12 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (758 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (194 citations) and Biotechnology (71 citations). J. N. de Vries has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include R.J. Bino, W. J. Feenstra, Bernard Witholt, Johanna Hovenkamp-Hermelink, W. A. Wietsma, E. Jacobsen, P. Adamse, J. Sybenga, H.L. Kraak and J.G. van Pijlen. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Annals of Botany and Chromosoma.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.