J. M. Pearson
Impact in
-
- Nuclear physics research studies
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
- Astronomical and nuclear sciences
- Radiation top 10%
- Nuclear Physics and Applications
Papers in
-
- Nuclear physics research studies 32
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 14
- Astronomical and nuclear sciences 6
-
- Atomic and Molecular Physics 10
- Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics 6
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies 5
- Co-authors
- F. Tondeur (3 shared papers)M. Farine (5 shared papers)M. Rayet (1 shared paper)N. G. Lloyd (1 shared paper)Colin Christopher (1 shared paper)B. Rouben (4 shared papers)Ramesh Chandra Nayak (2 shared papers)J. P. Arcoragi (3 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
J. M. Pearson
39 papers receiving 625 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 533
- Radiation 81
- Geometry and Topology 67
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 92
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 225
Countries citing papers authored by J. M. Pearson
This map shows the geographic impact of J. M. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. M. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. M. Pearson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. M. Pearson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. M. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. M. Pearson. The network helps show where J. M. Pearson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. M. Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 116 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 68 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1978 | 40 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1978 | 28 | |
| 7 | 1970 | 27 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 26 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 25 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 24 | |
| 12 | 1979 | 22 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 19 | |
| 14 | 1986 | 17 | |
| 15 | 1970 | 14 | |
| 16 | 1972 | 13 | |
| 17 | 1982 | 13 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1971 | 8 | |
| 20 | 1972 | 7 |
About J. M. Pearson
J. M. Pearson is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiation, Aerospace Engineering and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 647 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear physics research studies (32 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (14 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (10 papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (6 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (533 citations), Radiation (81 citations), Geometry and Topology (67 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (92 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (225 citations). J. M. Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include F. Tondeur, M. Farine, M. Rayet, N. G. Lloyd, Colin Christopher, B. Rouben, Ramesh Chandra Nayak, J. P. Arcoragi, Jean Côté and W. Stocker. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics A, Physics Letters B, The European Physical Journal A, Physical Review Letters and Nuclear Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.