J. Jansen

627 citations
17 papers · 447 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

J. Jansen

16 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers

J. Jansen
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Family Practice 83
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 96
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 102
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 146
  • Leadership and Management 6
Replace Elspeth J. R. Hill with:
Elspeth J. R. Hill United States
Sarah Woodrow United States
Laura Finucane United Kingdom
Gregory W Hartley United States
William L. Bockenek United States
Sarah Pitts United States
Pnina Weiss United States
W. Steiner Germany
Bradley Petrisor Canada
Sadiqa Syed Pakistan
J. Jansen relative to Elspeth J. R. Hill United States Elspeth J. R. Hill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Elspeth J. R. Hill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Jansen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Jansen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Jansen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Jansen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Jansen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Jansen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Jansen. The network helps show where J. Jansen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Jansen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Jansen Line = papers co-authored together J. Jansen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201714
2 20101
3 200618
4 20060
5 200482
6 200245
7 20005
8 199910
9 199861
10
Nitric oxide has little effect on acute pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular function during acute respiratory distress syndrome.
19972
11 199619
12 199552
13 199416
14 199417
15 199277
16 19887
17 198721

About J. Jansen

J. Jansen is a scholar working on Family Practice, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Information Management, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (7 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers), Radiology practices and education (3 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Thermal Regulation in Medicine (1 paper) and Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (83 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (96 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (102 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (146 citations) and Leadership and Management (6 citations). J. Jansen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Raphaela Verheggen, Cees van der Vleuten, Richard Grol, Lisa Tan, Anneke Kramer, J.F.V. Caekebeke, Michel D. Ferrari, P.R. Saxena, Jan‐Joost Rethans and Scheltus J. van Luijk. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education, Acta Neurochirurgica, Ultramicroscopy, European Spine Journal and European Journal of Anaesthesiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026