J. J. Berkhout

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
16 papers, 834 citations indexed

About

J. J. Berkhout is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, J. J. Berkhout has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 834 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 6 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in J. J. Berkhout's work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (5 papers). J. J. Berkhout is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (5 papers). J. J. Berkhout collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Taiwan and Spain. J. J. Berkhout's co-authors include Debbie Jaarsma, J. T. M. Walraven, Cees van der Vleuten, Pim W. Teunissen, Esther Helmich, Nynke van Dijk, Maaike Endedijk, Agnes Diemers, S. Jaakkola and T. W. Hijmans and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Neurology.

In The Last Decade

J. J. Berkhout

15 papers receiving 806 citations

Hit Papers

1 papers align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Self‐regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review

2018 173 citations J. J. Berkhout, Nynke van Dijk et al. Medical Education profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. J. Berkhout Netherlands	11	310	243	239	146	101	16	834
Donald L. Clark United States	16	65 0.2×	59 0.2×	83 0.3×	27 0.2×	23 0.2×	73	1.2k
David Gutiérrez Spain	21	99 0.3×	137 0.6×	126 0.5×	381 2.6×	56 0.6×	108	1.4k
Lidia Borghi Italy	17	319 1.0×	13 0.1×	139 0.6×	42 0.3×	399 4.0×	77	1.3k
Jyoti Prakash India	17	127 0.4×	17 0.1×	38 0.2×	8 0.1×	204 2.0×	101	779
Brian Winn United States	15	106 0.3×	41 0.2×	93 0.4×	275 1.9×	140 1.4×	37	944
Sarah Allen United States	16	28 0.1×	12 0.0×	61 0.3×	139 1.0×	50 0.5×	37	933
John E. Taplin Australia	18	105 0.3×	20 0.1×	107 0.4×	263 1.8×	55 0.5×	46	1.0k
Michel Alhilani United States	8	97 0.3×	22 0.1×	44 0.2×	4 0.0×	94 0.9×	11	495
Michael Greco United Kingdom	17	264 0.9×	134 0.6×	19 0.1×	3 0.0×	392 3.9×	57	852
Shinya Fujikawa Japan	17	38 0.1×	104 0.4×	90 0.4×	25 0.2×	33 0.3×	52	661

Countries citing papers authored by J. J. Berkhout

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. J. Berkhout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. J. Berkhout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. J. Berkhout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. J. Berkhout

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. J. Berkhout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. J. Berkhout. The network helps show where J. J. Berkhout may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. J. Berkhout

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. J. Berkhout. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. J. Berkhout based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. J. Berkhout. J. J. Berkhout is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

Alsem, Mattijs W., J. J. Berkhout, & Annemieke I. Buizer. (2020). Therapy needs and possibilities in paediatric rehabilitation during the COVID‐19 lockdown in the Netherlands. Child Care Health and Development. 46(6). 749–750. 6 indexed citations

Berkhout, J. J., et al.. (2018). Self‐regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review. Medical Education. 52(10). 1008–1015. 173 indexed citations breakdown →

Berkhout, J. J., Esther Helmich, Pim W. Teunissen, Cees van der Vleuten, & Debbie Jaarsma. (2017). Context matters when striving to promote active and lifelong learning in medical education. Medical Education. 52(1). 34–44. 113 indexed citations

Berkhout, J. J., Irene A. Slootweg, Esther Helmich, et al.. (2017). How characteristic routines of clinical departments influence students’ self-regulated learning: A grounded theory study. Medical Teacher. 39(11). 1174–1181. 9 indexed citations

Berkhout, J. J.. (2017). Medical students’ self-regulated learning in clinical contexts. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 1 indexed citations

Berkhout, J. J., Pim W. Teunissen, Esther Helmich, et al.. (2016). Patterns in clinical students’ self-regulated learning behavior: a Q-methodology study. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 22(1). 105–121. 32 indexed citations

Berkhout, J. J., Esther Helmich, Pim W. Teunissen, Cees van der Vleuten, & Debbie Jaarsma. (2016). How clinical medical students perceive others to influence their self‐regulated learning. Medical Education. 51(3). 269–279. 74 indexed citations

Berkhout, J. J., et al.. (2015). A qualitative interview study on the positive well-being of medical school faculty in their teaching role: job demands, job resources and role interaction. BMC Research Notes. 8(1). 401–401. 20 indexed citations

Berkhout, J. J., et al.. (2015). Exploring the factors influencing clinical students’ self‐regulated learning. Medical Education. 49(6). 589–600. 75 indexed citations

10.

Raaphorst, Joost, Emma Beeldman, Ben Schmand, et al.. (2012). The ALS-FTD-Q. Neurology. 79(13). 1377–1383. 78 indexed citations

11.

Berkhout, J. J. & J. T. M. Walraven. (1993). Scattering of hydrogen atoms from liquid-helium surfaces. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 47(14). 8886–8904. 10 indexed citations

12.

Berkhout, J. J., O.J. Luiten, I.D. Setija, et al.. (1989). Quantum reflection: Focusing of hydrogen atoms with a concave mirror. Physical Review Letters. 63(16). 1689–1692. 80 indexed citations

13.

Berkhout, J. J., et al.. (1988). Experiments with Atomic Hydrogen in a Magnetic Trapping Field. Physical Review Letters. 61(8). 931–934. 101 indexed citations

14.

Berkhout, J. J., et al.. (1987). Sensitive Bolometric Detection of Atomic Hydrogen Fluxes. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 26(S3-1). 231–231. 3 indexed citations

15.

Berkhout, J. J., et al.. (1986). Vanishing Sticking Probabilities and Enhanced Capillary Flow of Spin-Polarized Hydrogen. Physical Review Letters. 57(19). 2387–2390. 37 indexed citations

16.

Silvera, Isaac F., et al.. (1983). Direct Microscopic Study of Doubly Polarized Atomic Hydrogen by Electron-Spin Resonance. Physical Review Letters. 50(1). 53–56. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact