J. Gentens
Impact in
- Radiation top 5%
- Nuclear Physics and Applications
-
- Nuclear physics research studies
- Astronomical and nuclear sciences
Papers in
- Radiation 11
- Nuclear Physics and Applications 8
- Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques 3
-
- Nuclear physics research studies 8
- Co-authors
- P. Van DuppenP. Van den BerghYu. KudryavtsevM. HuyseL. VermeerenM. HuýseT. E. CocoliosD. Pauwels
In The Last Decade
J. Gentens
20 papers receiving 530 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Radiation 224
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 312
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 362
- Spectroscopy 142
- Aerospace Engineering 102
Countries citing papers authored by J. Gentens
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Gentens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Gentens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Gentens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Gentens
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Gentens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Gentens. The network helps show where J. Gentens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Gentens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 42 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 59 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 43 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 74 | |
| 16 | A study of 78Ni at an on-line mass separator : Utopia or Reality | 1996 | 1 |
| 17 | 1992 | 17 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 22 | |
| 19 | 1985 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1981 | 12 |
About J. Gentens
J. Gentens is a scholar working on Radiation, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 20 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (14 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (8 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (8 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (3 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (3 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (2 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (224 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (312 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (362 citations), Spectroscopy (142 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (102 citations). J. Gentens has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Japan and Poland. Frequent co-authors include P. Van Duppen, P. Van den Bergh, Yu. Kudryavtsev, M. Huyse, L. Vermeeren, M. Huýse, T. E. Cocolios, D. Pauwels, T. Sonoda and B. Bruyneel. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Review of Scientific Instruments, Nuclear Physics A, Physical Review Letters and Hyperfine Interactions.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.