N. Bree

2.2k total citations
11 papers, 260 citations indexed

About

N. Bree is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiation and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, N. Bree has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 260 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 5 papers in Radiation and 4 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in N. Bree's work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (5 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (4 papers) and Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers). N. Bree is often cited by papers focused on Atomic and Molecular Physics (5 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (4 papers) and Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers). N. Bree collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Poland. N. Bree's co-authors include Geertjan van Tienhoven, Ben J. Mijnheer, Harry Bartelink, B.J. Mijnheer, H. Huizenga, P. Van Duppen, M. Huyse, L.J. van Battum, T. E. Cocolios and D. Pauwels and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B and Radiotherapy and Oncology.

In The Last Decade

N. Bree

11 papers receiving 251 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
N. Bree Belgium 8 135 103 99 75 49 11 260
M.-A. Duval France 11 88 0.7× 91 0.9× 42 0.4× 85 1.1× 49 1.0× 32 258
O. L. Pechenaya United States 11 168 1.2× 160 1.6× 97 1.0× 86 1.1× 69 1.4× 23 320
A. Hirtl Austria 14 207 1.5× 92 0.9× 116 1.2× 212 2.8× 97 2.0× 44 444
S F C O'Rourke United Kingdom 8 63 0.5× 50 0.5× 145 1.5× 47 0.6× 40 0.8× 30 267
R. Wiehle Germany 11 93 0.7× 21 0.2× 154 1.6× 60 0.8× 122 2.5× 22 337
K. Yoshioka Switzerland 10 189 1.4× 187 1.8× 29 0.3× 99 1.3× 34 0.7× 22 370
D.W. Miller United States 11 113 0.8× 207 2.0× 118 1.2× 106 1.4× 43 0.9× 29 374
G. Mæhlum United States 9 183 1.4× 88 0.9× 32 0.3× 181 2.4× 49 1.0× 37 385
James Hamill United States 16 356 2.6× 102 1.0× 102 1.0× 701 9.3× 98 2.0× 70 893
James Proffitt United States 12 257 1.9× 40 0.4× 85 0.9× 294 3.9× 54 1.1× 25 375

Countries citing papers authored by N. Bree

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Bree's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Bree with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Bree more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Bree

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Bree. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Bree. The network helps show where N. Bree may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Bree

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Bree. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Bree based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. Bree. N. Bree is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Bree, N., K. Wrzosek-Lipska, P. A. Butler, et al.. (2015). X-ray production with heavy post-accelerated radioactive-ion beams in the lead region of interest for Coulomb-excitation measurements. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 360. 97–102. 3 indexed citations
2.
Ferrer, R., N. Bree, T. E. Cocolios, et al.. (2013). In-gas-cell laser ionization spectroscopy in the vicinity of 100Sn: Magnetic moments and mean-square charge radii of N=5054 Ag. Physics Letters B. 728. 191–197. 28 indexed citations
3.
Cocolios, T. E., A. N. Andreyev, B. Bastin, et al.. (2010). Magnetic dipole moments ofCu57,58,59. Physical Review C. 81(1). 23 indexed citations
4.
Cocolios, T. E., A. N. Andreyev, B. Bastin, et al.. (2009). Magnetic Dipole Moment ofCu57,59Measured by In-Gas-Cell Laser Spectroscopy. Physical Review Letters. 103(10). 102501–102501. 48 indexed citations
5.
Ştefânescu, I., D. Pauwels, N. Bree, et al.. (2009). Evidence for aβ-decaying1/2isomer inNi71. Physical Review C. 79(4). 6 indexed citations
6.
Pauwels, D., O. Ivanov, N. Bree, et al.. (2008). Shape isomerism atN=40: Discovery of a proton intruder state inCo67. Physical Review C. 78(4). 29 indexed citations
7.
Bree, N., et al.. (1994). Film dosimetry for radiotherapy treatment planning verification of a 6 MV tangential breast irradiation. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 31(3). 251–255. 25 indexed citations
8.
Mijnheer, Ben J., S. Heukelom, J.H. Lanson, et al.. (1991). Should inhomogeneity corrections be applied during treatment planning of tangential breast irradiation?. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 22(4). 239–244. 14 indexed citations
9.
Bree, N., L.J. van Battum, H. Huizenga, & Ben J. Mijnheer. (1991). Three-dimensional dose distribution of tangential breast treatment: a national dosimetry intercomparison. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 22(4). 252–260. 29 indexed citations
10.
Tienhoven, Geertjan van, N. Bree, B.J. Mijnheer, & Harry Bartelink. (1991). Quality assurance of the EORTC trial 22881/10882: “assessment of the role of the booster dose in breast conserving therapy”: the Dummy Run. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 22(4). 290–298. 54 indexed citations
11.
Bree, N., et al.. (1991). Production of $^{18}$F using static and circulating [$^{18}$O]-water targets. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026