Peter Thier
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.2%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 85
- Neural dynamics and brain function 51
- Face Recognition and Perception 19
- Neurology top 0.2%
- Vestibular and auditory disorders 64
- Sensory Systems top 0.5%
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 22
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 15
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders 35
-
- Action Observation and Synchronization 16
- Co-authors
- Peter W. DickeThomas HaarmeierAxel LindnerUwe J. IlgEmilio SalinasR.G. EricksonMatthis SynofzikNicolas Catz
- Journals
- Journal of Neurophysiology (15 papers)European Journal of Neuroscience (12 papers)Journal of Neuroscience (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
Peter Thier
160 papers receiving 6.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
- Cognitive Neuroscience 5.1k
- Neurology 2.0k
- Sensory Systems 514
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.3k
- Ophthalmology 596
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Thier
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Thier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Thier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Thier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Thier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Thier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Thier. The network helps show where Peter Thier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Thier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 145 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 25 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 49 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 232 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 38 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 89 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 41 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 25 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 304 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 11 |
About Peter Thier
Peter Thier is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sensory Systems, having authored 164 papers that have together received 6.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (85 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (64 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (51 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (35 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (22 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (19 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (16 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (5.1k citations), Neurology (2.0k citations) and Sensory Systems (514 citations). Peter Thier has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Peter W. Dicke, Thomas Haarmeier, Axel Lindner, Uwe J. Ilg, Emilio Salinas, R.G. Erickson, Matthis Synofzik, Nicolas Catz, Alla Ignashchenkova and Richard A. Andersen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, European Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Neuroscience, Experimental Brain Research and Current Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.