J. C. Thomas

6.2k total citations
113 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

J. C. Thomas is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, J. C. Thomas has authored 113 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 67 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 41 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 34 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in J. C. Thomas's work include Nuclear physics research studies (48 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (25 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (21 papers). J. C. Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (48 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (25 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (21 papers). J. C. Thomas collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and Belgium. J. C. Thomas's co-authors include P.R. Cobbold, Annick Chauvin, Olivier Bellier, Vincent Regard, Β. Blank, J. Giovinazzo, J. Mercier, Esmaeil Shabanian, I. Pollini and M.R. Abbassi and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres.

In The Last Decade

J. C. Thomas

108 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
J. C. Thomas 1.1k 1.0k 705 299 260 113 2.7k
E. Kankeleit 267 0.2× 971 1.0× 1.0k 1.4× 627 2.1× 212 0.8× 114 3.4k
K. Okamoto 1.6k 1.4× 344 0.3× 311 0.4× 120 0.4× 83 0.3× 62 2.3k
W. Schwarz 1.7k 1.4× 107 0.1× 544 0.8× 189 0.6× 413 1.6× 99 2.9k
H. Bowman 362 0.3× 1.0k 1.0× 339 0.5× 885 3.0× 170 0.7× 60 2.1k
Peter Mueller 122 0.1× 544 0.5× 651 0.9× 199 0.7× 195 0.8× 92 1.6k
K. Habicht 448 0.4× 170 0.2× 1.4k 2.0× 531 1.8× 285 1.1× 116 3.9k
Frank S. Henyey 151 0.1× 710 0.7× 251 0.4× 54 0.2× 479 1.8× 102 2.6k
Α. Dewald 98 0.1× 2.5k 2.5× 1.5k 2.1× 772 2.6× 258 1.0× 249 3.2k
E. Uggerhøj 179 0.2× 831 0.8× 1.6k 2.2× 1.4k 4.6× 115 0.4× 174 3.5k
M. Laubenstein 224 0.2× 1.2k 1.2× 371 0.5× 873 2.9× 90 0.3× 171 2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by J. C. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. C. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. C. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. C. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. C. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. C. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. C. Thomas. The network helps show where J. C. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. C. Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. C. Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. C. Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. C. Thomas. J. C. Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Delahaye, P., et al.. (2024). Radioactive ion-beam development at SPIRAL1. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2743(1). 12068–12068.
2.
Choi, S., A. Navin, A. Lemasson, et al.. (2023). CATLIFE (Complementary Arm for Target LIke FragmEnts): Spectrometer for Target like fragments at VAMOS++. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 540. 234–236.
3.
Balana, A., Β. Blank, L. Daudin, et al.. (2023). Commissioning of the DESIR high-resolution mass separator. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 541. 161–164. 1 indexed citations
4.
Fléchard, X., O. Naviliat-Cuncic, Sylvain Leblond, et al.. (2023). Precision measurements in the beta decay of 6He. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 282. 1010–1010. 1 indexed citations
5.
Jardin, P., et al.. (2023). Sub-millisecond atom-to-ion transformation in the TULIP ISOL system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 1055. 168332–168332. 2 indexed citations
6.
Dartois, E., P. Boduch, R. Brunetto, et al.. (2015). Heavy ion irradiation of crystalline water ice. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 576. A125–A125. 64 indexed citations
7.
Grinyer, G. F., M. Babo, P. Delahaye, et al.. (2015). High-precision half-life measurement for the isospinT=1/2mirrorβ+decay ofNa21. Physical Review C. 91(3). 10 indexed citations
8.
Dartois, E., A. L. F. de Barros, P. Boduch, et al.. (2013). Swift heavy ion irradiation of water ice from MeV to GeV energies. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 557. A97–A97. 57 indexed citations
9.
Fléchard, X., Emmanuel Liénard, G. Ban, et al.. (2012). First Measurement of Pure Electron Shakeoff in theβDecay of TrappedHe+6Ions. Physical Review Letters. 108(24). 243201–243201. 36 indexed citations
10.
Eronen, T., P. Ascher, L. Audirac, et al.. (2011). Precision half-life and Q -value measurement of the super-allowed $ \beta$ emitter 30S. The European Physical Journal A. 47(3). 11 indexed citations
11.
Rydt, M. De, R. Lozeva, N. Vermeulen, et al.. (2009). A new dedicated β-NMR/β-NQR setup for LISE-GANIL. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 612(1). 112–121. 3 indexed citations
12.
Fléchard, X., Emmanuel Liénard, A. Méry, et al.. (2008). Paul Trapping of RadioactiveHe+6Ions and Direct Observation of TheirβDecay. Physical Review Letters. 101(21). 212504–212504. 39 indexed citations
13.
Blank, Β., C. Borcea, G. Canchel, et al.. (2007). Production cross-sections of proton-rich 70Ge fragments and the decay of 57Zn and 61Ge. The European Physical Journal A. 31(3). 267–272. 11 indexed citations
14.
Giovinazzo, J., Β. Blank, C. Borcea, et al.. (2007). First Direct Observation of Two Protons in the Decay ofFe45with a Time-Projection Chamber. Physical Review Letters. 99(10). 102501–102501. 35 indexed citations
15.
Mueller, Peter, Ibrahim Sulai, A. C. C. Villari, et al.. (2007). Nuclear Charge Radius ofHe8. Physical Review Letters. 99(25). 252501–252501. 158 indexed citations
16.
Smirnov, D., F. Aksouh, S. Dean, et al.. (2005). Application of a thin double-sided microstrip detector for the registration of -delayed charge particles: The 6He decay into the two-body continuum of 6Li. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 547(2-3). 480–489. 11 indexed citations
17.
Félix, Yves, Stephen Halperin, & J. C. Thomas. (2003). Torsion primes in loop space homology. Topology. 43(2). 493–496.
18.
Giovinazzo, J., Β. Blank, M. Chartier, et al.. (2002). Two-Proton Radioactivity ofF45e. Physical Review Letters. 89(10). 102501–102501. 175 indexed citations
19.
Caprio, M. A., R. F. Casten, N. V. Zamfir, et al.. (2002). Properties of the low-lyingKπ=0+excitations in162Er. Physical Review C. 66(1). 6 indexed citations
20.
Félix, Yves, Stephen Halperin, & J. C. Thomas. (1994). Hopf Algebras and a Counterexample to a Conjecture of Anick. Journal of Algebra. 169(1). 176–193.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026