Benjamin W. Jarvis
- Philosophy top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Jonathan Jenkins IchikawaJ. Adam CarterM. FishbeinMary L. KambTamara HoxworthMichael IatestaC. Kevin MalotteEmma C. Gordon
- Topics
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science (15 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (15 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Benjamin W. Jarvis
24 papers receiving 285 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Philosophy 232
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 157
- Cognitive Neuroscience 119
- History and Philosophy of Science 43
- Sociology and Political Science 35
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin W. Jarvis
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin W. Jarvis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin W. Jarvis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin W. Jarvis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin W. Jarvis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin W. Jarvis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin W. Jarvis. The network helps show where Benjamin W. Jarvis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin W. Jarvis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin W. Jarvis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin W. Jarvis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin W. Jarvis. Benjamin W. Jarvis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Implementation of a WFOV Star Tracker in CubeSat and Small Satellite Attitude Determination Systems | 3 |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 47 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | Truth as One and Very Many | 1 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 33 |
About Benjamin W. Jarvis
Benjamin W. Jarvis is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Family Practice, having authored 28 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (15 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (15 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (232 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (157 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (43 citations). Benjamin W. Jarvis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa, J. Adam Carter, M. Fishbein, Mary L. Kamb, Tamara Hoxworth, Michael Iatesta, C. Kevin Malotte, Emma C. Gordon, David S. Bayard and Riccardo Poli. Their work appears in journals such as Nanomaterials, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters and AIDS Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.