Frédéric Neyrat

431 citations
48 papers · 139 indexed · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Frédéric Neyrat

32 papers receiving 108 citations

Peers

Frédéric Neyrat
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Geography, Planning and Development 33
  • Cultural Studies 27
  • Urban Studies 11
  • Literature and Literary Theory 17
  • Sociology and Political Science 67
Replace Aloïs Riegl with:
Aloïs Riegl
Stephen Rust United States
Michael Dylan Foster United States
Cathy Turner United Kingdom
Evi Ziegler c o EDV Fotowerk Huber
Eileen A. Joy United States
Liz Wells United Kingdom
David Joselit United States
Carolyn Birdsall Netherlands
Jennifer Ritterhouse United States
Frédéric Neyrat relative to Aloïs Riegl Aloïs Riegl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Aloïs Riegl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Neyrat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Neyrat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Neyrat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Neyrat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Neyrat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Neyrat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Neyrat. The network helps show where Frédéric Neyrat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Neyrat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Neyrat Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Neyrat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201728
2 201823
3 200613
4 20188
5 20175
6 20035
7 20174
8 20114
9 20133
10 20203
11 20163
12 20103
13
Clinamen : flux, absolu et loi spirale
20113
14 20083
15 20153
16
Le communisme existentiel de Jean-Luc Nancy
20132
17 20152
18 20162
19 20102
20 20062

About Frédéric Neyrat

Frédéric Neyrat is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 48 papers that have together received 139 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education, sociology, and vocational training (6 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (5 papers), Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (2 papers), Space exploration and regulation (2 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (2 papers) and Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (33 citations), Cultural Studies (27 citations), Urban Studies (11 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (17 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (67 citations). Frédéric Neyrat has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Donna Haraway, Karen Barad, Yves Citton, Isabelle Stengers, Franco Berardi, Virginie Maris, Steven Shaviro and Yann Moulier-Boutang. Their work appears in journals such as Multitudes, Les Temps Modernes, SubStance, French Politics and Angelaki.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact