István Bejczy
- Philosophy top 5%
- History top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Classics top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Richard Newhauser
- Topics
- Medieval Literature and History (10 papers)Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (8 papers)Medieval Philosophy and Theology (8 papers)
- Cited by
- ClassicsPhilosophyHistory
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
István Bejczy
18 papers receiving 77 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Philosophy 41
- History 36
- Sociology and Political Science 28
- Classics 28
- Political Science and International Relations 25
Countries citing papers authored by István Bejczy
This map shows the geographic impact of István Bejczy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by István Bejczy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites István Bejczy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by István Bejczy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by István Bejczy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by István Bejczy. The network helps show where István Bejczy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of István Bejczy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of István Bejczy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of István Bejczy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with István Bejczy. István Bejczy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | Cardinal Virtues in a Christian Context: The Antithesis between Fortitude and Humility in the Twelfth Century | 3 |
| 6 | Two Questions of Stephen Langton on the Cardinal Virtues | 2 |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | De contemplatione et eius speciebus: A work falsely attributed to Hugh of Saint Victor | 0 |
| 9 | John of La Rochelle and William Peraldus on the Virtues and Vices | 3 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | La lettre du Prêtre Jean : une utopie médiévale | 0 |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | Hans-Henning Kortüm. — Menschen und Mentalitäten. Einführung in Vorstellungswelten des Mittelalters. Berlin, Akad. Verlag, 1996. | 0 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | Drie humanisten en een mythe : de betekenis van Erasmus, Aurelius en Geldenhouwer voor de Bataafse kwestie | 1 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About István Bejczy
István Bejczy is a scholar working on Classics, History and Philosophy, having authored 29 papers that have together received 118 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (10 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (8 papers) and Medieval Philosophy and Theology (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (28 citations), Philosophy (41 citations) and History (36 citations). István Bejczy has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Richard Newhauser. Their work appears in journals such as Sixteenth Century Journal, Journal of the History of Ideas and Viator.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.