Isabel Correia
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jorge ValaClaudia DalbertPatrı́cia AguiarAna AlmeidaCícero Roberto PereiraShanmukh V. KambleMaria Luı́sa LimaMiguel R. Ramos
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (28 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (12 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPersonality and Social Psychology BulletinPersonality and Individual Differences
In The Last Decade
Isabel Correia
46 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Social Psychology 665
- Sociology and Political Science 651
- Cognitive Neuroscience 273
- Clinical Psychology 217
- Education 138
Countries citing papers authored by Isabel Correia
This map shows the geographic impact of Isabel Correia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Isabel Correia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Isabel Correia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Isabel Correia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Isabel Correia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Isabel Correia. The network helps show where Isabel Correia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Isabel Correia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Isabel Correia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Isabel Correia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Isabel Correia. Isabel Correia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 63 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 64 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 58 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | Are high strivers for justice more unjust when they react to a victim? Further evidence on the effects of the belief in a just world, of the innocence of the victim and of the persistence of suffering on secondary victimization | 2 |
| 20 | Variabilidade do Crescimento e da Forma de Proveniências de Pinus pinaster Aiton aos 8 Anos, na Mata Nacional do Escaroup | 1 |
About Isabel Correia
Isabel Correia is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Research and Theory and Applied Psychology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (28 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (665 citations), Applied Psychology (104 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (651 citations). Isabel Correia has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Brazil and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jorge Vala, Claudia Dalbert, Patrı́cia Aguiar, Ana Almeida, Cícero Roberto Pereira, Shanmukh V. Kamble, Maria Luı́sa Lima, Miguel R. Ramos, Maria Gouveia‐Pereira and Robbie M. Sutton. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.