Isaac N. Treves

421 total citations
23 papers, 190 citations indexed

About

Isaac N. Treves is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Isaac N. Treves has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 190 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Clinical Psychology, 14 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Isaac N. Treves's work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (15 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers). Isaac N. Treves is often cited by papers focused on Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (15 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers). Isaac N. Treves collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Isaac N. Treves's co-authors include Simon B. Goldberg, Richard J. Davidson, John D. E. Gabrieli, Eran Lottem, Matthijs N. Oude Lohuis, Zachary F. Mainen, Ola Ozernov‐Palchik, Matthew D. Sacchet, Clemens Bauer and Winson Fu Zun Yang and has published in prestigious journals such as Neuron, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Isaac N. Treves

18 papers receiving 185 citations

Peers

Isaac N. Treves
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 104
  • Clinical Psychology 102
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 55
  • Social Psychology 37
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 33
Replace Lilian Konicar with:
Lilian Konicar Germany
Roberta Clanton United Kingdom
Claire M. Kaplan United States
Elizabeth M. Mulligan United States
Eric Rawls United States
Masanori Isobe Japan
Areti Smaragdi United Kingdom
Thomas Morland United States
Aarit Ahuja United States
Ramona Dinu-Biringer Germany
Lilian Konicar Germany View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Isaac N. Treves
Isaac N. Treves · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Isaac N. Treves
Isaac N. Treves · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Isaac N. Treves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Isaac N. Treves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Isaac N. Treves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Isaac N. Treves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Isaac N. Treves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Isaac N. Treves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Isaac N. Treves. The network helps show where Isaac N. Treves may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Isaac N. Treves

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Isaac N. Treves. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Isaac N. Treves based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Isaac N. Treves. Isaac N. Treves is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 1
6 0
7 1
8 5
9 2
10 2
11 3
12 5
13 4
14 0
15 12
16 6
17 7
18 46
19 4
20 70

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026